2004
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.26777-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redox property and regulation of PpsR, a transcriptional repressor of photosystem gene expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both in vitro (4,15,32) and bioinformatic approaches (29) enabled detailed studies of PpsR repressor activity under different growth conditions to be performed. Also, gel mobility shift analyses allowed studies of in vitro binding of PpsR to the puc promoter of R. sphaeroides to be performed under oxidizing and reducing conditions in the absence of the antirepressor AppA and other cellular molecules (4,30). In addition, the use of transcriptional fusions and a heterologous expression system demonstrated that PpsR directly represses the transcription of puc and bchF in R. sphaeroides (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both in vitro (4,15,32) and bioinformatic approaches (29) enabled detailed studies of PpsR repressor activity under different growth conditions to be performed. Also, gel mobility shift analyses allowed studies of in vitro binding of PpsR to the puc promoter of R. sphaeroides to be performed under oxidizing and reducing conditions in the absence of the antirepressor AppA and other cellular molecules (4,30). In addition, the use of transcriptional fusions and a heterologous expression system demonstrated that PpsR directly represses the transcription of puc and bchF in R. sphaeroides (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that two palindromes (TGTcN 10 gACA) corresponding to the refined PpsR consensus binding sequence must be present for functional repression (33). Two mechanisms have been described as mechanisms that are responsible for the control of binding by PpsR: (i) oxidation-reduction of two conserved cysteine residues (Cys251 and Cys424) (13,31), which requires further investigation (4), and (ii) the interaction between PpsR and the AppA antirepressor protein, which has the unique property of being able to integrate oxygen and light signals (3). Since AppA is apparently present under all growth conditions at various levels, its effect on PpsR and the ultimate role of PpsR in PS gene expression is very complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masuda et al (23) determined the midpoint potential (E m ) for the disulfide bond formation of CrtJ to be Ϫ180 mV (at pH 7.0) by redox titration with GSH/ GSSG and also demonstrated that the intramolecular disulfide bond occurs only in aerobic and not in anaerobic cells. In contrast, however, Cho et al (4) reported that in R. sphaeroides cells, both critical cysteines of PpsR constantly exist in the reduced thiol form irrespective of the oxygen and light conditions. Strikingly, the E m value of PpsR, determined by Kim et al (18) is much more negative than CrtJ with a value of Ϫ320 mV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Oxidized CrtJ has lower affinity for DNA, and repression is released (37,44). Redox-dependent binding of PpsR has been demonstrated in vitro (7,37). However, the redox state of PpsR appears not to change in the cell with varying redox and light conditions (7; unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%