2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10932.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced efficacy of ivermectin, abamectin and moxidectin against field isolates of Haemonchus contortus

Abstract: A reduction in efficacy of abamectin and/or ivermectin against field isolates of H. contortus was identified from two farms in the New England region of New South Wales. The persistent effect of moxidectin was reduced against both isolates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A nationwide survey of sheep farms conducted in 2005 showed widespread resistance to commercially available anthelmintics (Waghorn et al 2006), while Leathwick (2004) conducted an analysis that estimated the total discounted cost of anthelmintic resistance accumulated over 30 years (from 2002) would exceed NZ$1.3 billion. Similar reports of anthelmintic resistance have been published in Australia (Wooster et al 2001; Love et al 2003), South Africa (Van Wyk et al 1989, 1999), and the United Kingdom (UK) (Yue et al 2003; Bartley et al 2005; Sargison et al 2007). A trial conducted in the southern sheep-producing zone of Western Australia, in weaned Merinos, estimated that production losses associated with using an ineffective anthelmintic compared with a fully effective one would be >A$2/animal in wool returns and >A$4/animal in animal value over a 12-month period (Besier et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…A nationwide survey of sheep farms conducted in 2005 showed widespread resistance to commercially available anthelmintics (Waghorn et al 2006), while Leathwick (2004) conducted an analysis that estimated the total discounted cost of anthelmintic resistance accumulated over 30 years (from 2002) would exceed NZ$1.3 billion. Similar reports of anthelmintic resistance have been published in Australia (Wooster et al 2001; Love et al 2003), South Africa (Van Wyk et al 1989, 1999), and the United Kingdom (UK) (Yue et al 2003; Bartley et al 2005; Sargison et al 2007). A trial conducted in the southern sheep-producing zone of Western Australia, in weaned Merinos, estimated that production losses associated with using an ineffective anthelmintic compared with a fully effective one would be >A$2/animal in wool returns and >A$4/animal in animal value over a 12-month period (Besier et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, moxidectin, by virtue of its potency, is still more than 95% effective against most strains of ML-resistant parasites on sheep farms in Australia, although the persistency of activity against such strains may be reduced. 3 In this paper we report the isolation of multi-drug including ML-resistant Haemonchus contortus from three farms in northern NSW in 2001/2002. One of these isolates is also moxidectin-resistant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Infeksi cacing nematoda gastrointestinal merupakan permasalahan kesehatan ternak ruminansia yang penting jika dipandang dari sisi ekonomi (Zvinorova et al, 2016). Infeksi tersebut dapat mengakibatkan depresi, penurunan nafsu makan, gangguan metabolisme protein, energi, mineral, perubahan keseimbangan cairan tubuh, anemia, penurunan pertambahan bobot hidup, peningkatan mortalitas dan gangguan reproduksi (Colley et al, 2001;West et al, 2009;De Graef et al, 2013;Jean et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Kejadian Resistensi Cacing Nematoda Gastrointestinal Terhadaunclassified