2016
DOI: 10.1111/liv.13182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced impact of renal failure on the outcome of patients with alcoholic liver disease undergoing liver transplantation

Abstract: Background and Aims Pre-transplant renal failure is commonly reported to be a poor prognostic indicator affecting survival after liver transplantation (LT). However, whether the impact of renal failure on patient outcome varies according to the etiology of the underlying liver disease is largely unknown. Methods We investigated the association between renal failure at the time of LT and patient outcome in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD)(n=6,920), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)(n=2,956) and h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are further reinforced by an earlier study using UNOS-STAR data that reported that the presence of pretransplant renal dysfunction was independently associated with lower survival following LT in alcohol-related liver disease and NASH patients. (28) We, however, did not detect any survival difference between the recipients with renal dysfunction before LT and recipients who received SLKT. Similar results have been shown in non-NASH recipients as well.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Our findings are further reinforced by an earlier study using UNOS-STAR data that reported that the presence of pretransplant renal dysfunction was independently associated with lower survival following LT in alcohol-related liver disease and NASH patients. (28) We, however, did not detect any survival difference between the recipients with renal dysfunction before LT and recipients who received SLKT. Similar results have been shown in non-NASH recipients as well.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Overall, case fatality was 4 out of 35, all of them occurred in the high MELD group. Cause of death was CMV (1), GVHD (1), persistent HRS (1) and sepsis (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whether the impact of renal failure on patient outcome varies according to the aetiology of the underlying liver disease is largely unknown. 1 Studies on comparative assessment of progressive renal dysfunction pre and post LT are controversial.…”
Section: How To Cite This Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although LT has become a standard treatment for acute and chronic end-stage liver disease contributed by NASH, there is not a consensus on the outcomes of the operation. Several separate studies (7)(8)(9)(10)(11) have shown that LT for NASH had increased mortality in early months or years compared to those treated for other indications, while no difference could be observed regarding long-term survival. Moreover, the reason for the shortterm mortality is still unclear.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%