2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5em00175g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced inorganic sulfur in surface sediment and its impact on benthic environments in offshore areas of NE China

Abstract: Geochemical cycling and biological toxicity of sulfur in marine sediments is closely related to the activity of organisms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that pyrite-Fe in the BHS surface sediments was not measured because it is usually fairly low and only accounts for a minor share of Fe HR in surface marine sediments underlying oxic bottom waters. For example, pyrite-Fe contents in surface sediments of the BHS and SYS previously reported by Sheng et al (2015) were 1.80 ± 1.1 and 2.84 ± 2.11 μmol/g, respectively, accounting for only 1.2% and 3.4% of Fe HR in the BHS and SYS, respectively (see Table 2). Therefore, an exclusion of pyrite-Fe has almost no influence on the quantity of Fe HR pool in surface sediments of the two seas.…”
Section: Iron Speciationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It is worth noting that pyrite-Fe in the BHS surface sediments was not measured because it is usually fairly low and only accounts for a minor share of Fe HR in surface marine sediments underlying oxic bottom waters. For example, pyrite-Fe contents in surface sediments of the BHS and SYS previously reported by Sheng et al (2015) were 1.80 ± 1.1 and 2.84 ± 2.11 μmol/g, respectively, accounting for only 1.2% and 3.4% of Fe HR in the BHS and SYS, respectively (see Table 2). Therefore, an exclusion of pyrite-Fe has almost no influence on the quantity of Fe HR pool in surface sediments of the two seas.…”
Section: Iron Speciationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…When the salinity increased, the product of sulfate reduction, that is, ∑H 2 S, accumulated (Burton et al., 2008). Fe(III) could be abiotically reduced by ∑H 2 S and yield FeS (Mohatt et al., 2011; Sheng et al., 2015). This abiotic Fe(III) reduction has larger reaction kinetics than microbial Fe(III) reduction and thus could compete for Fe(III) with microbial Fe(III) reduction (Kappler et al., 2021; Luo et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced inorganic sulfur (RIS) pools were determined using a slight modification of the sequential extraction method of Sheng et al (2015), as described by Newton et al (1995) and Hsieh and Shieh (1997). The RIS was divided into acid-volatile sulfide (AVS; 6 mol L −1 HCl, 1 h), chromium-reducible sulfide (CRS or pyrite-S; 15 mL acidic Cr 2+ , 2 h), and elemental sulfur (ES; 5 mL Cr 2+ + 20 mL N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) + 5 mL concentrated HCl, 1 h).…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%