1981
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90282-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced menstrual blood loss by release of an antifibrinolytic agent from intrauterine contraceptive devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more recent study described a mean reduction of similar magnitude (295ml reduced to 155ml) in 15 women (Andersch et al 1988). The potential of introducing antifibrinolytic medication directly into the uterine cavity by means of an intrauterine device has also been explored (Tauber et al 1981). The potential of introducing antifibrinolytic medication directly into the uterine cavity by means of an intrauterine device has also been explored (Tauber et al 1981).…”
Section: Tranexamic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent study described a mean reduction of similar magnitude (295ml reduced to 155ml) in 15 women (Andersch et al 1988). The potential of introducing antifibrinolytic medication directly into the uterine cavity by means of an intrauterine device has also been explored (Tauber et al 1981). The potential of introducing antifibrinolytic medication directly into the uterine cavity by means of an intrauterine device has also been explored (Tauber et al 1981).…”
Section: Tranexamic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of menstrual loss continues to be of clinical importance because it is related to diagnosis of menstrual-related iron deficiency anemia [1], to diagnosis and treat ment of menorrhagia [2][3][4] and to acceptabil ity of intrauterine devices [5,6], Further-more, measurement of menstrual loss is im portant in population studies where men strual patterns are related to health problems of women of reproductive age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of extracted iron is then compared to the concentration in 1 ml of the subject's blood [6][7][8]. While these tech- niques produce good replication of results, the presence of dyes in the sanitary products and the inability to extract all iron cause val ues to be consistently low with optimal re covery being about 80% [7], In addition to producing consistently low evaluations, iron analysis methods require an existing laboratory for drawing of blood, ex traction of iron, and spectrophotomctric comparison of samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%