2005
DOI: 10.2514/1.7077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced-Order Model for Efficient Simulation of Synthetic Jet Actuators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transpiration condition is imposed at the bottom of the slot's neck to simulate the velocity generated by the oscillating diaphragm. Similar boundary condition treatment produced satisfactory results at the CFDVAL2004 workshop, and has also been studied in detail by Yamaleev and Carpenter [23]. They demonstrated that for actuators with deep cavities, specifying the transpiration condition at a distance of at least 4-5 slot widths away from the slot exit produces only a small loss in numerical accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The transpiration condition is imposed at the bottom of the slot's neck to simulate the velocity generated by the oscillating diaphragm. Similar boundary condition treatment produced satisfactory results at the CFDVAL2004 workshop, and has also been studied in detail by Yamaleev and Carpenter [23]. They demonstrated that for actuators with deep cavities, specifying the transpiration condition at a distance of at least 4-5 slot widths away from the slot exit produces only a small loss in numerical accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The advantage is that everything is modelled on a stationary mesh. A promising approach seems to be a hybrid solution using Euler equations for the cavity and full Navier-Stokes for the exterior 34 . Lower-order and analytically-based solutions are very useful for getting a feeling which parameter combinations govern the physics.…”
Section: Lower-order and Hybrid Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, the SJ pressure level is extrapolated from the main flow interior. This practice does not preserve the conservation of mass, momentum and energy (Yamaleev et al 2005), which is a crucial point during the suction phase of the cycle, where pressure is the variable that determines the influx of mass. Moreover, from a numerical point of view, an error is introduced that greatly affects the accuracy, no matter how high the order of the scheme is.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%