2005
DOI: 10.1029/2005gl023968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced ozone loss at the upper edge of the Antarctic Ozone Hole during 2001–2004

Abstract: [1] The top edge (20 -22 km) of the Antarctic ozone hole has been identified as a good place to detect ozone recovery (D.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the partial column loss estimated at 350-600 K from Improved Limb Atmospheric Spectrometer (ILAS) measurements by applying the tracer correlation approach was 157±17 DU in early-October 2003 (Tilmes et al, 2006), which is close to our evaluation for the recent winters during the same period. Our conclusion on the interannual variability of ozone loss is also in line with the previous studies (Hofmann et al, 1997;Wu and Dessler, 2001;Bevilacqua et al, 1997;Solomon et al, 2005;Hoppel et al, 2005;Lemmen et al, 2006;Huck et al, 2007). The studies based on ozonesonde observations (for e.g.…”
Section: Antarctic Ozone Losssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For instance, the partial column loss estimated at 350-600 K from Improved Limb Atmospheric Spectrometer (ILAS) measurements by applying the tracer correlation approach was 157±17 DU in early-October 2003 (Tilmes et al, 2006), which is close to our evaluation for the recent winters during the same period. Our conclusion on the interannual variability of ozone loss is also in line with the previous studies (Hofmann et al, 1997;Wu and Dessler, 2001;Bevilacqua et al, 1997;Solomon et al, 2005;Hoppel et al, 2005;Lemmen et al, 2006;Huck et al, 2007). The studies based on ozonesonde observations (for e.g.…”
Section: Antarctic Ozone Losssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is slightly different from the Arctic, where significant ozone loss occurs mostly in the lower stratosphere over 350-550 K in colder winters and where the depletion above 550 K is limited to ∼ 19 ± 7 DU . The larger Antarctic ozone column loss contribution from higher altitudes (above 550 K) is consistent with the loss estimated above these altitudes, as shown by the ozone profiles in this study for and in Lemmen et al (2006 and Hoppel et al (2005) for a range of Antarctic winters prior to 2004. It is also evident from the maximum ozone loss altitudes, as most Antarctic winters have their peak loss altitudes around 525 K as opposed to 475 K in the Arctic (e.g., Kuttippurath et al, 2012;Tripathi et al, 2007;Grooß et al, 2005a;Rex et al, 2004).…”
Section: Partial Column Ozone Losssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Therefore, for the first time ozone loss and chlorine activation can be studied with high-resolution measurements that have very good spatial and temporal coverage inside the Antarctic vortex. Previous satellite measurements were relatively limited to a small temporal and spatial area as far as high-latitude observations are concerned (e.g., Tilmes et al, 2006;Hoppel et al, 2005). While the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite MLS (Waters et al, 1999) had a similar latitudinal coverage, the frequency of its polar measurements was lower than that of Aura MLS (e.g., Livesey et al, 2013;Froidevaux et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Austin et al, 2010). Although there are many studies using satellite data, a continuous long-term ozone loss analysis is still not available using these data (Bevilacqua et al, 1997;Hoppel et al, 2005;Tilmes et al, 2006). Therefore, we present a comprehensive ozone loss analysis in the Antarctic using ground-based and satellite measurements for the 1989-2010 period, similar to that in the Arctic (Goutail et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of them deal with the ozone loss analysis for individual winters, modelled or incomplete due to limitations of the analysed observations (e.g. Austin et al, 2010;Lemmen et al, 2006;Tilmes et al, 2006;Hoppel et al, 2005), and thus this makes the inter-annual comparison very difficult. For instance, the chemistry-climate model (CCM)-based studies are mostly exploited for the projection of ozone recovery (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%