1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1997.00134.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced tail regeneration in the Common Lizard, Lacerta vivipara, parasitized by blood parasites

Abstract: Summary 1.Many lizards will lose their tail through autotomy as an antipredator device even though there must be significant costs during tail regeneration. 2. Parasites are energetically costly to the host, and may reduce the rate of cell regeneration. The relation between the presence of haemogregarines (phylum Sporozoa) and the rate of tail regeneration in the Common Lizard Lacerta vivipara (Jacquin) was examined. 3. Experimentally induced autotomy in parasitized lizards resulted in a significantly reduced … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, gravid females may adopt cryptic behaviours and thus lower their susceptibility to predation [55]. Regardless of the lack of effect on female reproduction, our results strongly suggest that females were able to identify predator cues: not only did females lower their food intake (a classic antipredator response; E. Bestion, J. Cucherousset, A. Teyssier, J. Cote 2012, unpublished data) and grew longer tails than unexposed females (a costly antipredator strategy in lizards [56]; see the electronic supplementary material, S2), but also produced offspring with altered phenotypes. Females exposed to predator cues during gestation produced offspring with longer tails relative to their body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…On the other hand, gravid females may adopt cryptic behaviours and thus lower their susceptibility to predation [55]. Regardless of the lack of effect on female reproduction, our results strongly suggest that females were able to identify predator cues: not only did females lower their food intake (a classic antipredator response; E. Bestion, J. Cucherousset, A. Teyssier, J. Cote 2012, unpublished data) and grew longer tails than unexposed females (a costly antipredator strategy in lizards [56]; see the electronic supplementary material, S2), but also produced offspring with altered phenotypes. Females exposed to predator cues during gestation produced offspring with longer tails relative to their body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The intensity of infection in females seemed to increase in summer. Previous studies have demonstrated that an increase in reproductive effort decreases parasite defense and, thus, increases parasite load (Gustafsson et al 1994;Oppliger and Clobert 1997;Fargallo and Merino 2004). Therefore, females may need to reallocate most of resources in pregnancy, and assume the cost of a higher parasite infection during this period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested this hypothesis with the Canarian endemic lizard, Gallotia galloti, and its blood parasite, a member of the haemogregarine genus. Physiological costs to parasitism by haemogregarines have been demonstrated in another lizard species Lacerta vivipara (Oppliger et al, 1996;Oppliger & Clobert, 1997). For example, infection with haemogregarines reduces haemoglobin concentration, lowers locomotor speed and reduces the rate of tail regeneration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%