2011
DOI: 10.1017/s1471068411000093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing fuzzy answer set programming to model finding in fuzzy logics

Abstract: In recent years answer set programming has been extended to deal with multi-valued predicates. The resulting formalisms allows for the modeling of continuous problems as elegantly as ASP allows for the modeling of discrete problems, by combining the stable model semantics underlying ASP with fuzzy logics. However, contrary to the case of classical ASP where many efficient solvers have been constructed, to date there is no efficient fuzzy answer set programming solver. A well-known technique for classical ASP c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this example, like Example 5, uses nested connectives, such as ¬ s ¬ s , that are not available in previous fuzzy ASP semantics, such as [2,3].…”
Section: Definition and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that this example, like Example 5, uses nested connectives, such as ¬ s ¬ s , that are not available in previous fuzzy ASP semantics, such as [2,3].…”
Section: Definition and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While they do not subsume each other, it is clear that many real-world problems require both their strengths. This led to the body of work on combining fuzzy logic and the stable model semantics, known as fuzzy answer set programming (e.g., [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]). However, most work considers simple rule forms and do not allow connectives nested arbitrarily as in fuzzy logic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many fuzzy reasoning tasks can be reduced to SAT ∞ , including reasoning about vague concepts in the context of the semantic web [4], fuzzy spatial reasoning [5] and fuzzy answer set programming [6], which in itself is an important framework for non-monotonic reasoning over continuous domains (see e.g. [7], [8], [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like its classical counterpart, it is useful for solving a variety of problems. Indeed, many fuzzy reasoning tasks can be reduced to SAT∞, including reasoning about vague concepts in the context of the semantic web [11], fuzzy spatial reasoning [9] and fuzzy answer set programming [7], which in itself is an important framework for non-monotonic reasoning over continuous domains (see e.g. [8,13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%