2015
DOI: 10.2144/000114320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing Microbial and Human Contamination in DNA Extractions from Ancient Bones and Teeth

Abstract: Although great progress has been made in improving methods for generating DNA sequences from ancient biological samples, many, if not most, samples are still not amenable for analyses due to overwhelming contamination with microbial or modern human DNA. Here we explore different DNA decontamination procedures for ancient bones and teeth for use prior to DNA library preparation and high-throughput sequencing. Two procedures showed promising results: (i) the release of surface-bound DNA by phosphate buffer and (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
227
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
227
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We took measures to avoid and detect protein contamination throughout our palaeoproteomic workflow. Ancient DNA analysis followed protocols outlined elsewhere (53,54), as did stable isotope and radiocarbon analysis of collagen extracts (55). All biomolecular extractions were performed in dedicated facilities at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We took measures to avoid and detect protein contamination throughout our palaeoproteomic workflow. Ancient DNA analysis followed protocols outlined elsewhere (53,54), as did stable isotope and radiocarbon analysis of collagen extracts (55). All biomolecular extractions were performed in dedicated facilities at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bones were sampled using a sterile dentistry drill, and between 15 and 30 mg bone powder was used for DNA extraction, with the exception of Vi-*28, in which three separate parts of the bone were sampled (SI Appendix, Table S3). DNA extraction was performed using a method for ultrashort DNA fragment retrieval (33) with modifications (34). The bone powder of Vi-207 and Vi-208 was treated with 0.5% hypochlorite solution before DNA extraction (34) to remove microbial and modern human DNA contamination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bone powder of Vi-207 and Vi-208 was treated with 0.5% hypochlorite solution before DNA extraction (34) to remove microbial and modern human DNA contamination. Next-generation sequencing libraries were prepared from 10 μL of each extract, using two single-stranded library preparation schemes: Vi-207 and Vi-208 with a previously published method (35), with modifications from Korlevi c et al (34), and Vi-*28 with an automated library preparation scheme (36). Libraries were amplified and labeled with a pair of unique index sequences (37,38).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extracted 339 DNA [54][55][56] and prepared barcoded next generation sequencing libraries, the majority of which 340…”
Section: Ancient Dna Analysis 338mentioning
confidence: 99%