2004
DOI: 10.1179/135100004225005994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing power: the measure of antioxidant activities of reductant compounds?

Abstract: Electrochemical assay has been employed recently to study the activity of antioxidants; however, there is controversy as to whether reducing power fully characterizes the antioxidant activity. This study provides some essential further evidence on this point based on the reported data and mechanisms underlying the antioxidant functions as well as the anodic oxidation of phenolic antioxidants, indicating that further consideration and investigation should be made before reducing power is used as the absolute me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it is known from the literature, caffeic acid has a higher antioxidant capacity as compared to cinnamic and coumaric acids. This behaviour is also observed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As it is known from the literature, caffeic acid has a higher antioxidant capacity as compared to cinnamic and coumaric acids. This behaviour is also observed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, the antioxidant capacity of the studied extracts was evaluated in terms of reducing power using CUPRAC and FRAP assays. Several factors governed the reducing potential of antioxidants, namely their ionization potentials, spin distribution of the radical cations and the bond dissociation energy of the phenolic O-H bond [36]. With CUPRAC assay, 1 g of methanolic twig extract exhibited a remarkably high Trolox equivalent value (1336.88 mg TE) followed by aqueous twig (1082.00 mg TE).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MICs increased 2.5-fold (from 8 g/ml to 20 g/ml) in the presence of ascorbic acid and Ͼ30-fold (from 8 g/ml to Ͼ250 g/ml) in the presence of glutathione, compared to that of the controls ( Table 2), suggesting that the protective effect against streptomycin is more pronounced with glutathione than with ascorbic acid. The enhanced protective effect seen with glutathione might be due to the dependence of the protective ability of the given antioxidant on its reducing power (6) or to the contribution of glutathione metabolism proteins involved in detoxification pathways in prokaryotes (23). We also investigated whether this antioxidant-mediated protection phenomenon is specific to MG1655 or whether it can be seen across diverse E. coli K-12 strains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%