2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.83.036207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the bias of causality measures

Abstract: Measures of the direction and strength of the interdependence between two time series are evaluated and modified to reduce the bias in the estimation of the measures, so that they give zero values when there is no causal effect. For this, point shuffling is employed as used in the frame of surrogate data. This correction is not specific to a particular measure and it is implemented here on measures based on state space reconstruction and information measures. The performance of the causality measures and their… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This constitutes a main direction for further research, because real-world processes display very often non-Gaussian distributions, which would make an extension to nonlinear models or model-free approaches beneficial. The questions that are still open in this respect include the evaluation of proper theoretical definitions of synergy or redundancy for nonlinear processes [25][26][27][28][29], the development of reliable entropy estimators for multivariate variables with different dimensions [6,35,61] and the assessment of the extent to which non-linear model-free methods really outperform the linear model-based approach adopted here and in previous investigations [62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This constitutes a main direction for further research, because real-world processes display very often non-Gaussian distributions, which would make an extension to nonlinear models or model-free approaches beneficial. The questions that are still open in this respect include the evaluation of proper theoretical definitions of synergy or redundancy for nonlinear processes [25][26][27][28][29], the development of reliable entropy estimators for multivariate variables with different dimensions [6,35,61] and the assessment of the extent to which non-linear model-free methods really outperform the linear model-based approach adopted here and in previous investigations [62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most comparative works on the effectiveness of causality measures concentrate on bivariate tests, e.g., [33][34][35][36], while some works evaluating multivariate methodologies include only model-based tests, see, e.g., [37][38][39], or compare direct and indirect causality measures, e.g., [36,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A measure that has been used in a variety of fields, and which is both dynamic and non-symmetric, is Transfer Entropy, developed by Schreiber [39] and based on the concept of Shannon Entropy, first developed in the theory of information by Shannon [40]. Transfer entropy has been used in the study of cellular automata in Computer Science [41][42][43], in the study of the neural cortex of the brain [44][45][46][47][48][49], in the study of social networks [50], in Statistics [51][52][53][54], and in dynamical systems [55][56][57], and received a thermodynamic interpretation in [58].…”
Section: Transfer Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%