2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)02084-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the genome size of organelles favours gene transfer to the nucleus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
86
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This can lead to the nuclear gene either evolving a new function or becoming non-functional (i.e. a pseudogene) and finally erode [73]. If the gene product, however, -probably much more rarely -becomes targeted to its site of function, loss of either copy could be fixed by selection (or stochastically).…”
Section: A Mechanistic View On Gene Transfersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can lead to the nuclear gene either evolving a new function or becoming non-functional (i.e. a pseudogene) and finally erode [73]. If the gene product, however, -probably much more rarely -becomes targeted to its site of function, loss of either copy could be fixed by selection (or stochastically).…”
Section: A Mechanistic View On Gene Transfersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dissimilarity in genome compactness cannot be explained by mutation rate differences because the estimated mutation rates in the two genetic compartments seem to be quite similar. Other factors that might explain this difference include a possible reduction in the power of random genetic drift in the mitochondrial compartment compared to the nuclear one as discussed by Lynch et al (2006) or selection for mitochondrial genome streamlining because of competition among mtDNA molecules for faster replication time (Selosse et al 2001).…”
Section: Trpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During evolution, organellar genomes have been partly reduced in size and DNA sequence fragments have been transferred to nucleus (Bensasson et al, 2001;Selosse et al, 2001). Some DNA sequences, referred to as 'promiscuous DNA' are still moving between these three genomes (Ellis, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%