2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-bmt.2018.5259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the template ageing effect in on‐line signature biometrics

Abstract: On-line signature recognition is an area of growing interest in recent years due to the massive deployment of high-quality digitizing tablets, smartphones, and tablets in many commercial sectors such as banking. In addition, handwritten signature is one of the most socially accepted biometric traits as it has been used in financial and legal agreements for over a century. In this current environment for signature biometrics, the number of stored samples or templates per user can grow very fast, making it possi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we would like to highlight the impossibility of performing a fair comparison among approaches as different databases and experimental protocol conditions have been considered in each study. Aspects such as the inter-session variability, the number of training signatures available per user or the complexity of the signatures have a very significant impact in the system performance [28], [29]. This problem is not only related to deep learning approaches, but to the whole handwritten signature verification field.…”
Section: On-line Signature Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%

DeepSign: Deep On-Line Signature Verification

Tolosana,
Vera-Rodriguez,
Fierrez
et al. 2020
Preprint
Self Cite
“…First, we would like to highlight the impossibility of performing a fair comparison among approaches as different databases and experimental protocol conditions have been considered in each study. Aspects such as the inter-session variability, the number of training signatures available per user or the complexity of the signatures have a very significant impact in the system performance [28], [29]. This problem is not only related to deep learning approaches, but to the whole handwritten signature verification field.…”
Section: On-line Signature Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%

DeepSign: Deep On-Line Signature Verification

Tolosana,
Vera-Rodriguez,
Fierrez
et al. 2020
Preprint
Self Cite
“…It is also important to note that in the field of forensics, what separates an untrained person from a skilled investigator is the rate of false positives and the number of cases for which only an inconclusive opinion about the authors' identity may be expressed [9]. Many systems help to analyze a handwritten text [10][11][12][13][14], which utilizes such experts' features. There are also methods, based on signature analysis, that help diagnose a variety of illnesses, such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On-line handwritten signature verification has always been a very active area of research due to its high popularity for authentication scenarios [9] and the variety of open challenges that are still under research nowadays [14], e.g., one/few-shot learning [20,10,27,45], device interoperability [2,30,36,44], aging [22,41], types of impostors [40,21], signature complexity [24,43,47], template storage [8], etc. Despite all these challenges, the performance of on-line signature verification systems has been improved in the last years due to several factors, especially: i) the evolution in the acquisition technology going from devices specifically designed to acquire handwriting and signature in office-like scenarios through a pen stylus (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%