Reducing uncertainty when using knee‐specific finite element models by assessing the effect of input parameters

Abstract

Little is known about knee-specific factors that influence contact mechanics. Finite Element (FE) models offer a powerful tool to study contact mechanics, but there often exists ambiguity in the exact values of the inputs (tissue properties, for example), which can result in a range of output values. Our objective was to quantify the reduction in the range of output values (defined herein as “uncertainty”) from FE models of the human knee joint when known pre-defined values are used for clinically measurable inputs. To achieve this goal, we applied a statistically-augmented FE approach to three human cadaveric knees for which full geometric and kinematic data were available. Two sets of conditions were simulated: All model inputs, clinically measurable or not, were varied to represent a ‘normal’ patient population (Condition 1); subsets of clinically measurable variable inputs were fixed at specific values (called patient derived inputs, or PDIs) while the other variables were varied over ‘normal’ values (Condition 2). We found that by fixing body mass index and the anterior-posterior position of the meniscal-bony insertion points, model output uncertainty was reduced by one- to three-fifths. The magnitude of uncertainty reduction was strongly influenced by the individual knee. It was observed that knees with great anterior-posterior translation during gait had greater reductions in uncertainty when PDIs were used. This study represents the first step in developing FE models of the human knee joint based on inputs that can be derived from patients in a clinical setting.

Características Morfométricas de los Discos Articulares de la Rodilla en Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética de Mujeres Colombianas

“…Con relación a la aplicación del presente estudio para el desarrollo de MEF parametrizables de los DAR, se logra concluir que de las siete variables cuantificadas solo debería considerarse el promedio de las tres que presentaron variaciones estadísticamente significativas o cercanas a ella, con el fin de ahorrar tiempo y recurso computacional al momento de elaborar el MEF (Guo et al, 2017;Cooper et al, 2019).…”

Finite element modeling with subject‐specific mechanical properties to assess knee osteoarthritis initiation and progression

“…The proximal surface of the femoral cartilage was fixed to the reference point using a rigid interface contact and all nodes on the distal surface of the medial and lateral tibial cartilage were fixed 12 . The menisci were constrained using a fixed displacement boundary condition applied to the meniscal horns where the meniscal roots would typically attach 39,40 . Before the stance phase commenced, models underwent a 0.1 s ramping stage, which adjusted the model to match the initial placement and force at the beginning of the stance phase.…”

Meniscal repair: The current state and recent advances in augmentation

“…Additional variables including sex, age, pre‐existing conditions, and concomitant injuries play a role in meniscal injury and healing. Personalizing the approach represents a future direction in clinical management, even more so as we start to appreciate knee‐to‐knee variability in joint mechanics 135 . Indeed, we should not lose sight of the fact that any potential solution should restore the ability of the meniscus to distribute load across the articular surfaces of the knee joint.…”