2000
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-30-7-1088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction in branch sapwood hydraulic permeability as a factor limiting survival of lower branches of lodgepole pine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
54
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
54
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearwater and Meinzer (2001) found that both specific and leaf-specific hydraulic conductivities (LSC) in Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden increased with branch height in the crown, while LSC declined as the branch grew larger. Protz et al (2000) reported that hydraulic permeability in Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud., expressed on either leaf area or sapwood area basis, was significantly smaller in lower branches (0.16·10 À5 and 5.82·10 À5 m 2 , respectively) than upper branches (0.26·10 À5 and 10.47·10 À5 m 2 , respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clearwater and Meinzer (2001) found that both specific and leaf-specific hydraulic conductivities (LSC) in Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden increased with branch height in the crown, while LSC declined as the branch grew larger. Protz et al (2000) reported that hydraulic permeability in Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud., expressed on either leaf area or sapwood area basis, was significantly smaller in lower branches (0.16·10 À5 and 5.82·10 À5 m 2 , respectively) than upper branches (0.26·10 À5 and 10.47·10 À5 m 2 , respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, within a crown, the length of the water transport pathway does not necessarily determine the resistance to the flow of water, because both the specific conductivity of xylem and the leaf area to sapwood area ratio may vary among different parts of the crown. However, there are still few studies indicating a systematic variation in xylem hydraulic capacity between the branches inserted at different heights in the stem (Joyce and Steiner 1995;Protz et al 2000;Lemoine et al 2002;Aasamaa et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their complicated branching patterns mean that each leaf on the tree will have a different path length from the ground. Also, the hydraulic architecture has been shown to be designed in such a way that branches receiving more sunlight are hydraulically favored over lower branches (Protz et al 2000). Much of this complexity could be avoided if a simpler tree species such as palms were used to study hydraulic limitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opposite patterns of hydraulic capacity have often been revealed within crowns of both coniferous and broad-leaved trees: specific hydraulic conductivity of branches (Protz et al 2000;Lemoine et al 2002;Jerez et al 2004;Burgess et al 2006) or shoot hydraulic conductance increased with branch height in the crown (Aasamaa et al 2004). Also apparent soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance (G T ), defined as a current transpiration rate divided by water potential drop from soil to leaves (Meinzer et al 1995;Wullschleger et al 1998), has been shown to increase from basal to top branches (Sellin and Kupper 2004, 2005a, 2007a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distribution of hydraulic conductance within the crown is an essential factor driving canopy development during forest maturation. Protz et al (2000) suggested that reduction in branch sapwood hydraulic conductivity over time limits survival of lower branches, and therefore controls the vertical crown recession in closed-canopy trees. On the other hand, forest management operations may have substantial consequences on plant hydraulics, affecting both growth rate of trees and wood characteristics (Renninger et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%