2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.11.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of cancer cell viability by synergistic combination of photodynamic treatment with the inhibition of the Id protein family

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the resulting helical cyclopeptides, cyclo‐(2,6)‐( Ac ‐VKRLQDLQ‐ NH 2 ) ( 1 ) could nicely mimic the side‐chain hydrophobic pattern of the two ID‐protein helices at positions i, i+3, and i+6 (Figure 1A), as shown by the comparison of the NMR solution structure of 1 38 with the crystal structure of the ID2 HLH homodimer 39 . Moreover, 1Y , an analog of 1 containing an additional C‐terminal residue (Tyr‐9, used as internal chromophore) and whose NMR solution structure has been elucidated in this work (Figure 1B), was found to be an ID protein‐binding candidate that negatively modulated the cell‐cycle progression of cancer cells 38 and further achieved synergistic effects in combination with photodynamic therapy 40 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the resulting helical cyclopeptides, cyclo‐(2,6)‐( Ac ‐VKRLQDLQ‐ NH 2 ) ( 1 ) could nicely mimic the side‐chain hydrophobic pattern of the two ID‐protein helices at positions i, i+3, and i+6 (Figure 1A), as shown by the comparison of the NMR solution structure of 1 38 with the crystal structure of the ID2 HLH homodimer 39 . Moreover, 1Y , an analog of 1 containing an additional C‐terminal residue (Tyr‐9, used as internal chromophore) and whose NMR solution structure has been elucidated in this work (Figure 1B), was found to be an ID protein‐binding candidate that negatively modulated the cell‐cycle progression of cancer cells 38 and further achieved synergistic effects in combination with photodynamic therapy 40 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In this work, we have investigated a series of analogs of the lactam‐bridged nonapeptide 1Y , which is a ligand of the ID proteins and reduces cancer cell viability 38,40 . These analogs, which differ from 1Y in the hydrophobic pattern (residues 1, 4, 7, and 9), were found to be comparable to or less effective than 1Y in the cancer cell viability assay: In particular, the replacement of Leu‐4 with Tyr‐4 was unfavorable (Figure S9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SnP has an IC 50 value of 9.8 μM (phototoxic index > 2.1; ratio of IC 50 value in dark/light), while SnPH exhibits almost 3-fold better phototoxicity with an IC 50 value of 2.9 μM (phototoxic index > 6.9). Porphyrin-related photosensitizers that have been developed for PDT, such as Photofrin®, Foscan® and 5,10,15,20- tetrakis (4-hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin ( p -THPP), and hypericin have previously been used as positive controls in this context, 30,31 but this is now routinely omitted. 8,9,11,13 Since SnP and SnPH have similar Φ Δ values, the difference in PDT activity cells can be attributed to the higher cellular uptake observed for SnPH .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All cytotoxic therapies result in pro-survival treatment responses like upregulated cytokine signaling from the tumor cells that often result in failure of the primary treatment and recurrence of disease [76]. Combining remotely triggered cytotoxic agents with drugs that can tackle these pro-survival treatment responses is helping reduce therapeutic outcomes in several in vitro and in vivo models of cancer [44,75,77,78]. Our understanding of the intricacies involved in effective removal and subsequent therapeutic administration of anti-cancer drugs to GBM tumors is that nanoencapsulated drug therapy may significantly enhance BBB penetration and cancer cell targeting using reduced drug concentrations required for efficacy, as well as side effects and inadvertent damage to healthy tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%