Inhibitors of DNA binding and cell differentiation (Id) proteins are members of the large family of the helix-loop-helix (HLH) transcription factors, but they lack any DNA-binding motif. During development, the Id proteins play a key role in the regulation of cell-cycle progression and cell differentiation by modulating different cell-cycle regulators both by direct and indirect mechanisms. Several Id-protein interacting partners have been identified thus far, which belong to structurally and functionally unrelated families, including, among others, the class I and II bHLH transcription factors, the retinoblastoma protein and related pocket proteins, the paired-box transcription factors, and the S5a subunit of the 26 S proteasome. Although the HLH domain of the Id proteins is involved in most of their protein-protein interaction events, additional motifs located in their N-terminal and C-terminal regions are required for the recognition of diverse protein partners. The ability of the Id proteins to interact with structurally different proteins is likely to arise from their conformational flexibility: indeed, these proteins contain intrinsically disordered regions that, in the case of the HLH region, undergo folding upon self- or heteroassociation. Besides their crucial role for cell-fate determination and cell-cycle progression during development, other important cellular events have been related to the Id-protein expression in a number of pathologies. Dysregulated Id-protein expression has been associated with tumor growth, vascularization, invasiveness, metastasis, chemoresistance and stemness, as well as with various developmental defects and diseases. Herein we provide an overview on the structural properties, mode of action, biological function and therapeutic potential of these regulatory proteins.

No abstract

No abstract

Synthetic helical peptides are valuable scaffolds for the development of modulators of protein-protein interactions involving helical motifs. Backbone-to-side chain or side chain-to-side chain constraints have been and still are intensively exploited to stabilize short α-helices. Very often, these constraints have been combined with backbone modifications induced by Cα-tetrasubstituted, β-, or γ-amino acids, which facilitate the α-peptide or α/β/γ-peptide adopting an α-helical conformation. In this work, we investigated the helical character of octapeptides that were cyclized by a Lys-Asp-(i,i + 4)-lactam bridge. We started with two sequences extracted from the helix-loop-helix region of the Id proteins, which are inhibitors of cell differentiation during development and in cancer. Nineteen analogs containing the lactam bridge at different positions and displaying different amino acid core triads (i + 1,2,3) as well as outer residues were prepared by solid-phase methodology. Their conformation in water and water/2,2,2-trifluoroethanol mixtures was investigated by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. The cyclopeptides could be grouped in helix-prone and non-helix-prone structures. Both the amino acid core triad (i + 1,2,3) and the pendant residues positively or negatively affected the formation of a helical structure. Computational studies based on the NMR-derived helical structure of a cyclopeptide containing Aib at position (i + 2) of the triad were generally in agreement with the secondary structure propensity of the cyclopeptides observed by CD spectroscopy. In conclusion, the Lys-Asp-(i,i + 4)-lactam bridge may succeed or fail in the stabilization of short helices, depending on the primary structure. Moreover, computational methods may be valuable tools to discriminate helix-prone from non-helix-prone peptide-based macrolactams. Copyright © 2017 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

No abstract