1996
DOI: 10.1116/1.580419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of gap states of ternary III–V semiconductor surfaces by sulfur passivation: Comparative studies of AlGaAs and InGaP

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inTwodimensional bulk bands and surface resonances originated from (100) surfaces of III-V semiconductor compounds AIP Conf.The effects of sulfur passivation on liquid-phase-epitaxy-grown n-type InGaP and AlGaAs surfaces have been studied using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The surfaces were simultaneously prepared through degreasing and the use of an aqueous ͑NH 4 ͒ 2 S x treatment in air. For InGaP, sulfur atoms initially reacted with both surface In and Ga atoms and reacte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in the case of a narrow gate-recess structure, the cap layer is not removed except the gate-foot landing area; therefore, the InAlAs surface states do not dominantly affect the electric potential inside the channel. The reason why the InGaAs free surface state (narrow gate-recess structure) has negligible density compared to the InAlAs surface state (wide gate-recess structure) is not clearly understood; however, one possible cause is related to the Al-O bond on the InAlAs, which is observed in the AlGaAs surface by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy [27]. This type of Al-O defect on the surface of Al-alloy compound semiconductor is hardly removed even by the sulfur treatment unlike other surface bonds because of its high thermal stability.…”
Section: Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in the case of a narrow gate-recess structure, the cap layer is not removed except the gate-foot landing area; therefore, the InAlAs surface states do not dominantly affect the electric potential inside the channel. The reason why the InGaAs free surface state (narrow gate-recess structure) has negligible density compared to the InAlAs surface state (wide gate-recess structure) is not clearly understood; however, one possible cause is related to the Al-O bond on the InAlAs, which is observed in the AlGaAs surface by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy [27]. This type of Al-O defect on the surface of Al-alloy compound semiconductor is hardly removed even by the sulfur treatment unlike other surface bonds because of its high thermal stability.…”
Section: Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently surface passivation topic is quite active in GaAs-related solar cells [15,[33][34][35][36][37], but without any discovery of a permanent solution to the active surface problem [2,38]. Sulfur (S) passivation has been the most promising surface treatment, significantly improving surface electrical properties and drawing considerable attention [39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. The improvement in S passivation also involved a highly controlled atmosphere and high-temperature annealing, yielding ideal surface electrical properties [46][47][48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%