2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of Urban Storm-Runoff Pollution Using Porous Concrete Containing Iron Slag Adsorbent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with runoff mitigation, PCP has been most promising in reducing TSS loadings versus IBPG and PICP. This result may be due to its rough and porous surface structure, which is capable of trapping sediments while storing water volume within the surface and media [52][53][54][55][56]. Furthermore, the existing innovative storage design (0.13 m), consisted of #2 open-graded aggregates followed by #52 washed stone, which might be effective in particulate trapping within its enlarged void spaces.…”
Section: Water Quality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with runoff mitigation, PCP has been most promising in reducing TSS loadings versus IBPG and PICP. This result may be due to its rough and porous surface structure, which is capable of trapping sediments while storing water volume within the surface and media [52][53][54][55][56]. Furthermore, the existing innovative storage design (0.13 m), consisted of #2 open-graded aggregates followed by #52 washed stone, which might be effective in particulate trapping within its enlarged void spaces.…”
Section: Water Quality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the ceramic and cement permeable bricks had organic dissolution phenomena and the steel slag permeable brick did not. Steel slag permeable bricks contain much iron, and iron with a large specific surface area can adsorb dissolved organic matter, which is responsible for the high removal rate of COD [26,27].…”
Section: Results Of the Static Adsorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COD removal rate of the volcanic rock was obviously better than those of zeolite, iron filings and gravel, mainly due to the high content of Fe 2 O 3 in volcanic rock [31,32], which had good adsorption of the COD. The removal rate between the volcanic rocks and gravel differed by 25.58% in the case of the same diameter, indicating that the adsorption properties of the materials played a key role in the COD removal and that adding fillers rich in Fe 2 O 3 could improve the removal rate of COD.…”
Section: Water Purification Effectiveness Of Different Materialsmentioning
confidence: 93%