2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of viral loads by multigenic DNA priming and adenovirus boosting in the SIVmac-macaque model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, rhesus macaques that were primed with SIV plasmid DNA, including IL-12 DNA, prior to recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-SIV administration exhibited the best protective outcome after SHIV 89.6P challenge (13). With regard to a pathogenic SIV challenge model, priming three times with a multigenic SIV plasmid DNA plus IL-12 DNA followed by boosting with a multigenic nonreplicating Ad recombinant without IL-12 led to reduced viral burdens after intrarectal SIV mac251 challenge (60). This study was promising although difficult to evaluate, as few animals were studied and rapid progressors, but not Mamu-A*01 macaques, were eliminated from statistical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, rhesus macaques that were primed with SIV plasmid DNA, including IL-12 DNA, prior to recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-SIV administration exhibited the best protective outcome after SHIV 89.6P challenge (13). With regard to a pathogenic SIV challenge model, priming three times with a multigenic SIV plasmid DNA plus IL-12 DNA followed by boosting with a multigenic nonreplicating Ad recombinant without IL-12 led to reduced viral burdens after intrarectal SIV mac251 challenge (60). This study was promising although difficult to evaluate, as few animals were studied and rapid progressors, but not Mamu-A*01 macaques, were eliminated from statistical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay was performed as described previously (10,39), with the modification that cells were stimulated by each of the seven hRSV-F peptide pools at 2 g ml Ϫ1 for each peptide. The positive control consisted of cells stimulated by Staphylococcus enterotoxin B (SEB) at a final concentration 1 g ml Ϫ1 ; negative controls comprised cells kept in medium alone or stimulated by an irrelevant peptide pool derived from human hepatitis C virus sequences (11,12,34).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data from most of the animals have been published before. 25,36,50 All monkeys were naive with respect to immunization against SIV or any other antiviral treatment, except for the six immunized monkeys displaying the rapid progressor phenotype. A total of 30 animals were infected with SIV mac 251 grown on monkey peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC).…”
Section: Animals Genealogies and Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Briefly, purified PBMCs were resuspended in Elispot medium and seeded in triplicate in wells coated with anti-human IFN-g monoclonal antibody. For antigenic stimulation, SIV Gag (15-mer, EVA7066, NIBSC) and Nef peptides (20-mer, EVA777, NIBSC), peptide pools or SEB were included in the medium.…”
Section: Elispot Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%