2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00152-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redundancy gain in simple reaction time following partial and complete callosotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible neural mechanism for facilitation and interference between global and local processing levels involves interhemispheric interactions (Corballis et al, 2004;Forster and Corballis, 2000). Evidence from a split-brain study (Robertson et al, 1993) suggests that the corpus callosum mediates local-global interference.…”
Section: The Role Of the Corpus Callosum In Interference And Facilitamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible neural mechanism for facilitation and interference between global and local processing levels involves interhemispheric interactions (Corballis et al, 2004;Forster and Corballis, 2000). Evidence from a split-brain study (Robertson et al, 1993) suggests that the corpus callosum mediates local-global interference.…”
Section: The Role Of the Corpus Callosum In Interference And Facilitamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thut et al 1999;Tettamanti et al 2002;Zaidel 2003, 2004), or already at a visual level (e.g. Brown et al 1994;Ipata et al 1997;Murray et al 2001; see also Corballis et al 2003 for supporting evidence from patients with partial callosal lesions/sections). Others, applying a case-study approach to the analysis of electrophysiological data, report how visuo-motor routing varies both between individuals and also as a function of reaction time (Saron et al 2003a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Clearly, with two targets contributing activation toward the same threshold, the response is activated more rapidly than when there is only one target contributing activation. Although the concept of coactivation originally proposed by Miller (1982Miller ( , 1986 was not necessarily linked to neural activity, several more recent studies on brain-damaged patients and with neuroimaging techniques have argued convincingly that it is equivalent of neural summation and interhemispheric interaction (Corballis 1998;Corballis et al 2002Corballis et al , 2003Iacoboni et al 2000;Iacoboni and Zaidel 2003;Marzi et al 1996;Miniussi et al 1998;Reuter-Lorenz et al 1994;Corballis 2002, 2003;Savazzi and Marzi 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%