2001
DOI: 10.1109/50.917866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redundancy strategies for a high splitting optically amplified passive optical network

Abstract: Abstract-High splitting, optically amplified, passive optical networks (SuperPONs) are investigated in terms of redundancy provision and protection mechanisms. Options for redundancy, including the important special case of dual homing, are detailed, and it is determined as to which of these options (duplication of the feeder and first distribution section, and + 1 protection of the optical amplifiers in the amplified splitter) would be required to be provided to all attached users to facilitate appropriate av… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, protection against a metro node failure is of primary importance for the LR-PON-based architecture. A basic and effective protection mechanism for LR-PON is to dual parent each system onto two metro/outer core nodes [4], [2]. This is similar to a simple protection solution for IP routers known as double or redundant protection [5].…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, protection against a metro node failure is of primary importance for the LR-PON-based architecture. A basic and effective protection mechanism for LR-PON is to dual parent each system onto two metro/outer core nodes [4], [2]. This is similar to a simple protection solution for IP routers known as double or redundant protection [5].…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we have considered protection links up to the first PON split (or local exchange site), leaving the "last-mile" unprotected. This is a common choice for residential customers, while protection can be extended to the user premises for business customers [4], [2]. For example, considering Figure 1, if metro node 1 fails, its PONs will be protected by metro node 2.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A catastrophic failure at a Metro/Core (MC) node could bring down all the PONs terminated by the node (e.g., potentially hundreds of thousand of customers), for a period of time that, depending on the severity of the accident, could be as long as several weeks. Although such large-scale failures are rare, it is recognized [18] that the catastrophic effects they would cause would not be tolerable, therefore its risk cannot be neglected.…”
Section: Related Work On Gpon Protection and Its Lr-pon Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several efforts on providing survivability for a dual-homed IP-based access network over WDM-based core networks [10], [11]. In all this literature, the authors consider providing survivability separately at the IP layer, as well as at the WDM layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all this literature, the authors consider providing survivability separately at the IP layer, as well as at the WDM layer. In [10], the authors discuss how to support dual homing in passive optical networks, while [11] studies survivability in IP-over-WDM networks and provides different protection types (unprotected, protected, and dual homing) for each IP link, in order to keep the networks connected in the event of link failure. The focus of our paper is to present a coordinated solution for providing protection in an IP-over-WDM dual-homing network.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%