2006
DOI: 10.21236/ada443010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reengineering and Fast Manufacturing for Impact-Induced Fatigue and Fracture Problems in Aging Aircrafts

Abstract: The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the ering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regardir matio including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directo fferso Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any of ailing comply with a collection of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did the first screening on nine leading software tools that are commercially available. This screening was carried out based on the information provided in product brochure, technical reports (for example, Siddique, 2002;Chang et al, 2006), thesis (for examle, Gibson, 2004), company web sites, on-line software demo, case study reports, etc. After the screening, we acquired four tools and conducted hands-on evaluations, using five industrial examples.…”
Section: Engineering Software Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did the first screening on nine leading software tools that are commercially available. This screening was carried out based on the information provided in product brochure, technical reports (for example, Siddique, 2002;Chang et al, 2006), thesis (for examle, Gibson, 2004), company web sites, on-line software demo, case study reports, etc. After the screening, we acquired four tools and conducted hands-on evaluations, using five industrial examples.…”
Section: Engineering Software Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%