2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.024413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reentrant spin-glass state and magnetodielectric effect in the spiral magnetBiMnFe2O6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
28
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
9
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, another way to check whether the present transition is of spin glass type, we have studied freezing temperature T f as a function of frequency. For a typical spin-glass transition, it is characterized by a parameter = ઢ ‫܂‬ ઢ() [12,32,33] , where the value of p should be of the order of 0.01, where T f is the freezing temperature at frequency f. But in the present investigation, the value we obtained is ̴ 0.286 which is much greater than typical p value for spin glass. Therefore, this result confirms that the observed freezing transition is different from typical spin glass transition.…”
Section: (B)contrasting
confidence: 59%
“…However, another way to check whether the present transition is of spin glass type, we have studied freezing temperature T f as a function of frequency. For a typical spin-glass transition, it is characterized by a parameter = ઢ ‫܂‬ ઢ() [12,32,33] , where the value of p should be of the order of 0.01, where T f is the freezing temperature at frequency f. But in the present investigation, the value we obtained is ̴ 0.286 which is much greater than typical p value for spin glass. Therefore, this result confirms that the observed freezing transition is different from typical spin glass transition.…”
Section: (B)contrasting
confidence: 59%
“…14,16,32,40,41 A high value of τ * also points toward the fact that in Cr 0.5 Fe 0.5 Ga, spin dynamics occurs in a slow manner, due to the presence of interacting clusters rather than individual spins. 32,39 No significant change in zν was observed while changing the field from 0 to 0.25 T but the value of τ * is changed by an order of magnitude which is still within the range expected for cluster-SG systems. The presence of interacting clusters is also evident from the failure of Arrhenius law to fit the frequency dependent T f data.…”
Section: Ac Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The parameters, τ * and zν are believed to give more reliable insight into the SG dynamics. For conventional SG systems, the value of zν typically lies between ∼ 4 and ∼ 12 while the value of τ * ranges from 10 −10 s to 10 −13 s. 14,16,[38][39][40] Similarly, for the canonical SG and cluster SG, the characteristic range of τ * varies from ∼ 10 −12 s to ∼ 10 −13 s and ∼ 10 −7 to ∼ 10 −10 , respectively. 2,14,32,40,41 Clearly, our obtained values of τ * and zν fall within the ranges reported for typical cluster SG systems.…”
Section: Ac Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the value of T SG ∼ 25.2 K obtained from T f (H ) versus H 2/3 plot is closer to that obtained from power-law/Vogel-Fulcher spin dynamics. The AT line has been reported for both the canonical SG as well as CSG systems using field dependence of either T irr (H ) [83][84][85] or T f (H ) [30,[86][87][88][89] and represents the boundary between the high-temperature ergodic and low-temperature nonergodic phases. While the original formulation for the AT line was for Ising spins [79], subsequent theoretical papers have shown that it can occur in Heisenberg systems also if the single-ion anisotropy is low and positive [82].…”
Section: Evidence For the Existence Of De Almeida-thouless Line Inmentioning
confidence: 99%