2014
DOI: 10.1086/674596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference Dependence and Labor Market Fluctuations

Abstract: We incorporate reference-dependent worker behavior into a search-matching model of the labor market, in which firms have all the bargaining power and productivity follows a log-linear AR(1) process. Motivated by Akerlof (1982) and Bewley (1999), we assume that existing workers' output falls stochastically from its normal level when their wage falls below a "reference point", which (following Kőszegi and Rabin (2006)) is equal to their lagged-expected wage. We formulate the model game-theoretically and show tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, transparency could lead workers to experience low morale, and reduce effort or quit their jobs upon learning peers make more money (Akerlof and Yellen (1990), Card, Mas, Moretti, and Saez (2012), Cullen and Perez‐Truglia (2022), Perez‐Truglia (2020), Breza, Kaur, and Shamdasani (2018), Dube, Giuliano, and Leonard (2019), Cohn, Fehr, Herrmann, and Schneider (2014), Bracha, Gneezy, and Loewenstein (2015)). In the presence of morale concerns, we would expect an employer to equalize wages only if the productivity consequences from transparency were larger than the additional wage bill incurred; otherwise, the employer would rationally allow pay differences to continue (Eliaz and Spiegler (2013)). In follow‐up work, we discuss how bargaining forces may subsume morale concerns, leading wages to be equalized even when productivity consequences are small in comparison to the wage gap (Cullen and Pakzad‐Hurson (2022)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, transparency could lead workers to experience low morale, and reduce effort or quit their jobs upon learning peers make more money (Akerlof and Yellen (1990), Card, Mas, Moretti, and Saez (2012), Cullen and Perez‐Truglia (2022), Perez‐Truglia (2020), Breza, Kaur, and Shamdasani (2018), Dube, Giuliano, and Leonard (2019), Cohn, Fehr, Herrmann, and Schneider (2014), Bracha, Gneezy, and Loewenstein (2015)). In the presence of morale concerns, we would expect an employer to equalize wages only if the productivity consequences from transparency were larger than the additional wage bill incurred; otherwise, the employer would rationally allow pay differences to continue (Eliaz and Spiegler (2013)). In follow‐up work, we discuss how bargaining forces may subsume morale concerns, leading wages to be equalized even when productivity consequences are small in comparison to the wage gap (Cullen and Pakzad‐Hurson (2022)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a second example, continuing workers might have a reference point of their own past wage, and object to wage cuts because of morale. These considerations might matter less for new hires (Eliaz and Spiegler, 2014).…”
Section: Infrequent Wage Changes At the Job Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Eliaz and Spiegler (2013) consider a search‐and‐matching framework, in which effort depends on a reference point, to provide a rationale for downward wage rigidity. The model can also be interpreted as efficiency‐wage set‐up.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%