1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02278595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference standards for quantitative trace analysis of PCB's by GC. Technical PCB formulations for the calibration of ECD and MSD responses

Abstract: SummaryThe composition of any technical PCB formulation can be determined directly by analyzing the PCB sample by gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID), provided the relative molecular masses of the components are known. The responses of electron capture and selected-ion monitoring, mass-spectra detectors can then be calibrated for individual PCB congeners by correlation of the chromatographic patterns with those of concentrated PCB samples obtained by GC-FID. This procedure, which uses … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the correction factor for the dichlorinated biphenyls was the average one determined for PCB-5 and PCB-12, that for the trichlorinated biphenyls was calculated via averaging of the values for PCB-29, PCB-30, and PCB-28, and finally those for tetra-and pentachlorinated biphenyls were taken equal to those determined for PCB-52 and PCB-101, respectively. Such assumption was in line with the available reference data [11] stating that the correction factors to be applied for processing of gas chromatography data were practically the equal for the chlorinated biphenyls with the same number of chlorine atoms in the molecule. The content of congeners of each group was calculated as follows.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…In particular, the correction factor for the dichlorinated biphenyls was the average one determined for PCB-5 and PCB-12, that for the trichlorinated biphenyls was calculated via averaging of the values for PCB-29, PCB-30, and PCB-28, and finally those for tetra-and pentachlorinated biphenyls were taken equal to those determined for PCB-52 and PCB-101, respectively. Such assumption was in line with the available reference data [11] stating that the correction factors to be applied for processing of gas chromatography data were practically the equal for the chlorinated biphenyls with the same number of chlorine atoms in the molecule. The content of congeners of each group was calculated as follows.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Fractions of di-through tetra-ortho substituted PCBs and mono-ortho substituted PCBs from carbon chromatography were analyzed by high-resolution capillary gas chromatography with an electron capture detector (GC/ECD) to quantitate 66 discrete congeners and 20 combined congener peaks. Identification and quantification of PCB congeners were done with mixed Aroclor standards (23,25,26). Mono-ortho PCBs were identified and quantified using individual standards (23).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%