Landolt-Börnstein - Group II Molecules and Radicals
DOI: 10.1007/10048563_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

References

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 790 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MNDO/d shows the lowest mean absolute error for the investigated compounds. The dipole moment of magnesium oxide was reported to be 5.94 D . We obtained 6.79 D using AM1, while PM3 predicts 5.03 D and MNDO/d 6.08 D .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…MNDO/d shows the lowest mean absolute error for the investigated compounds. The dipole moment of magnesium oxide was reported to be 5.94 D . We obtained 6.79 D using AM1, while PM3 predicts 5.03 D and MNDO/d 6.08 D .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…However, quadrupole splitting was not expected to be large and presumably unresolved because it has been found that the boron quadrupole coupling constants are relatively small. 24 Another factor that might lead to splitting of the rotational lines is tunneling of the BH 3 group. This effect depends strongly on the vibrational state of the torsion about the N-B bond and is much larger in excited states of this mode than that in the ground state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect should lead to a complex quadrupole splitting of the rotational transitions. However, quadrupole splitting was not expected to be large and presumably unresolved because it has been found that the boron quadrupole coupling constants are relatively small . Another factor that might lead to splitting of the rotational lines is tunneling of the BH 3 group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of reliable experimental reference data is often a difficult practical problem that may involve a judgement on the accuracy of published experimental results. To be as unbiased as possible, we have preferentially taken the experimental data from recognized standard compilations for heats of formation, molecular geometries, ionization potentials, and dipole moments. In the case of multiple entries, we have usually adopted the following priorities: refs > 23 > 24 > 25 > 26, refs > 28 > 29 > 30 > 31, and refs > 34 > 35 > 36. In addition, experimental reference data have been taken from specialized reviews for heats of formation and occasionally also from previous semiempirical evaluations. , Generally we have attempted to exclude experimental reference data of low or dubious accuracy.…”
Section: Statistical Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%