2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2008
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2008.4738853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refined instrumental variable methods for identification of Hammerstein continuous-time Box-Jenkins models

Abstract: This article presents instrumental variable methods for direct continuous-time estimation of a Hammerstein model. The non-linear function is a sum of known basis functions and the linear part is a Box-Jenkins model. Although the presented algorithm is not statistically optimal, this paper further shows the performance of the presented algorithms and the advantages of continuous-time estimation on relevant simulations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An instrumental variable (IV) method using the nonlinear transformed instruments has been studied to improve the estimates' consistency [17]. For Hammerstein Box-Jenkin models, a refined IV method has been reported based on the extended framework [18]. Although the IV methods are consistent, the parameter reduction step and the regularization of nonlinear basis functions were not discussed.…”
Section: Most Of the Iterative Identification Methods Transform The Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An instrumental variable (IV) method using the nonlinear transformed instruments has been studied to improve the estimates' consistency [17]. For Hammerstein Box-Jenkin models, a refined IV method has been reported based on the extended framework [18]. Although the IV methods are consistent, the parameter reduction step and the regularization of nonlinear basis functions were not discussed.…”
Section: Most Of the Iterative Identification Methods Transform The Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this the coefficient of the first basis function is assumed to be 1, i.e. d 1 = 1 [1,7,[11][12][13][14][15][17][18]. Then the estimates of the coefficient vectors a and β can be obtained by considering the following minimization problem:…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst there would appear to be an issue associated with the estimates of the over-parameterised B( β ) in (32), whereby b¯s and b s are combined within one vector, it was shown in [41] that b¯s can be directly obtained from …”
Section: Considering Zero Initial Conditions the Laplace Transform Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The refined instrumental variable method for linear continuous-time systems was first proposed by Young and Jakeman [39] and extended for the fractional-order systems in [40]. It has also been successfully extended to estimate the parameters of the Hammerstein and Wiener models [38,41] in which the static output non-linear function is assumed to be invertible [38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason of this increasing interest is that IV methods offer a similar performance to the extended Least Square (LS) methods or other Prediction Error Minimization (PEM) methods (see Ljung (2009), Rao and Garnier (2004)) and provide consistent results even for an imperfect noise structure which is the case in most practical applications. These approaches have been used in many different frameworks such as direct continuous-time (Garnier & Wang, 2008;Rao & Garnier, 2004), nonlinear (Laurain, Gilson, Garnier, & Young, 2008) or closed-loop identification (Gilson, Garnier, Young, & Van den Hof, 2009;Gilson & Van den Hof, 2005) and lead to optimal estimates in the LTI linear case if the system belongs to the model set defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%