2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2333(02)00090-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refinement of the Episkin® protocol for the assessment of acute skin irritation of chemicals: follow-up to the ECVAM prevalidation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
28
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…During 1999 and 2000, ECVAM commissioned a validation study of five in vitro tests for acute skin irritation. This study specifically addressed aspects of protocol refinement (phase I), protocol transfer (phase II), and protocol performance (phase III), in accordance with the scheme defined by ECVAM (Botham, 2004; Fentem et al., 2001; Portes et al., 2002). Results indicated an acceptable intra‐laboratory reproducibility.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During 1999 and 2000, ECVAM commissioned a validation study of five in vitro tests for acute skin irritation. This study specifically addressed aspects of protocol refinement (phase I), protocol transfer (phase II), and protocol performance (phase III), in accordance with the scheme defined by ECVAM (Botham, 2004; Fentem et al., 2001; Portes et al., 2002). Results indicated an acceptable intra‐laboratory reproducibility.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the use of various experimental protocols which differ in the concentrations of the applied irritants used, the time of exposure, and the time of incubation made it difficult to create a standardized protocol for assessing irritation in vitro (Welss et al., 2004). Protocol refinements and improvements in 2007 enabled two skin reconstruct models to be validated by ECVAM for use as alternative methods in skin irritation tests (Botham, 2004; Fentem and Botham, 2002; Fentem et al., 2001; Hoffmann et al., 2008; Portes et al., 2002).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The in vitro approach that consists in the use of excised or reconstructed skin for validation tests (percutaneous absorption, toxicological risks, development of drugs, safety studies for cosmetic products) appears to be therefore inevitable. 1,5 This approach has been adopted by the ''guideline test'' 428 of the OECD (organization for economic co-operation and development). 6 The present sources for excised human skin are not sufficient to cover the need; therefore animal skin mainly from rat and pig are used instead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Since then, different models of reconstructed skin were developed, studied, and commercialized. 1,3,5,11,12 These models were characterized and compared by several techniques to natural skin, excised human skin, and animal model skin (rat and pig). 13,14 Among the techniques actually used to study the skin, Raman spectroscopy presents the advantages of being nondestructive, it also allows a real-time structural and molecular analysis, without requiring any sample preparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlation between in vitro and in vivo data is high. The test was able to correctly identify corrosive and noncorrosive chemicals 89–91. The Skin2™ model in vitro skin corrosivity test uses a three‐dimensional human skin which has dermal, epidermal and corneal layers.…”
Section: Alternatives To Skin Corrosivitymentioning
confidence: 99%