2022
DOI: 10.1080/21568235.2022.2056494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refining the Spady–Tinto approach: the roles of individual characteristics and institutional support in students’ higher education dropout intentions in Luxembourg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the course "Structural equation modeling" students are asked to analyze the model built by researchers from Luxembourg with Eurostudent VII microdata (figure 6) [8]. Research questions of this model are as follows: "How do individual characteristics impact the dropout intention via student commitment and integration?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the course "Structural equation modeling" students are asked to analyze the model built by researchers from Luxembourg with Eurostudent VII microdata (figure 6) [8]. Research questions of this model are as follows: "How do individual characteristics impact the dropout intention via student commitment and integration?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study on enrolees in Norwegian welfare state professions, Helland and Hovdhaugen (2021) find no social inequalities in dropout among students in nursing, pre‐school teaching and social work, and only quite small social differences among student teachers. Overall, however, the social differences in dropout rates are considerable (e.g., Aina, 2013; Contini et al., 2018; Hadjar et al., 2022; Li & Carroll, 2020; Ortiz & Dehon, 2013; Powdthavee & Vignoles, 2008; Thomas & Quinn, 2006). The reasons for dropping out also vary between educational fields, and Yorke (2000) finds that an inability to cope with programme demands was a more common reason among students in clinical studies and engineering, whereas dissatisfaction was a more widespread reason in art education.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article examines how social disparities in dropout rates vary by educational field. Previous research has established that students from upper‐ and middle‐class backgrounds, in general, have higher completion rates than their fellow students from working‐class backgrounds (e.g., Contini et al., 2018; Hadjar et al., 2022; Li & Carroll, 2020). Social inequalities in dropout rates thus add to existing social inequalities in educational attainment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These commitments are continually modified by the students' interactions with the social and academic systems of the institution (Fincham et al, 2021). Students who demonstrate delayed or minimal commitment, limit their integration and subsequently increase their risk of drop out (Hadjar et al, 2022). It is only through academic performance and academically purposive interactions between peers and teachers that they [the students] also becomes academically integrated (Naylor et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%