2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refining tools for studying cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) reproduction in captivity: In Vivo sexual determination, tagging and DNA collection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, all the DRS of the present experiment were smaller than the ≈ 150 days reported by Boletzky (1987). On the other hand, despite the lower average weight of the cuttlefish used in the present study, when compared with that of the Sykes et al (2013) and Sykes et al (2017b) experiments (≈ 33g in the first when compared with ≈ 46 g in the remaining two studies; F1 and F3 captive generations, respectively), a higher mean duration of the growth stage (DGS) was observed in the present study (≈ 150 days vs. 105 days and 23 days, respectively). Unfortunately, we only have records of cuttlefish age prior to their use in the present experiment (75 days after hatching) and different values might related to the age of animals at the start of each study.…”
Section: Reproductioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, all the DRS of the present experiment were smaller than the ≈ 150 days reported by Boletzky (1987). On the other hand, despite the lower average weight of the cuttlefish used in the present study, when compared with that of the Sykes et al (2013) and Sykes et al (2017b) experiments (≈ 33g in the first when compared with ≈ 46 g in the remaining two studies; F1 and F3 captive generations, respectively), a higher mean duration of the growth stage (DGS) was observed in the present study (≈ 150 days vs. 105 days and 23 days, respectively). Unfortunately, we only have records of cuttlefish age prior to their use in the present experiment (75 days after hatching) and different values might related to the age of animals at the start of each study.…”
Section: Reproductioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…More recently, Sykes et al (2006a) reported smaller life spans in several consecutive generations cultured in captivity and a possible relation of this smaller life cycle with seawater temperature. Interestingly, the values of duration of the reproduction stage (DRS) could not be related with the increasing tank volumes (Sykes et al, 2013), nor with different sizes of bottom areas (Sykes et al, 2017b), or both (the present paper data). In fact, all the DRS of the present experiment were smaller than the ≈ 150 days reported by Boletzky (1987).…”
Section: Reproductioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
See 3 more Smart Citations