2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-017-0725-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflected shock tube experiments on aeroacoustic signature of hot jets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) are provided by a reflected shock wave. Different shock and reflected shock strengths are generated through proper helium/air mass fractions at different pressures and temperatures while the driven section is vacuumed to the designed pressure (Jahromi et al;2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1) are provided by a reflected shock wave. Different shock and reflected shock strengths are generated through proper helium/air mass fractions at different pressures and temperatures while the driven section is vacuumed to the designed pressure (Jahromi et al;2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial driven pressure (P1) is specified so that when the designed initial and reflected shock waves passes over the driven gas, the designed pressure at nozzle reservoir (P5) for an ideally expanded jet at M = 1.4 is gained. The length of driver and driven section, the diameter of the shock tube pipe, and the helium/air mass fraction are tailored to have the maximum test time (Jahromi et al, 2017). The test time of quasi-steady pressure and temperature at nozzle reservoir is limited by the arrival of the reflected expansion waves from the end of driver section and is 11 ms in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations