2022
DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2022.2029418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflecting on an Integrated Approach to Understanding Pathways for Socially Inclusive Agricultural Intensification

Abstract: The IA frameworks outlined below are conceptual models that identify and delineate the main elements of each theme and their causal connections, capturing the structure and functioning of the system. Each framework maps out assumptions about the process by which change occurs from interventions or activities through to the targeted outcomes. We took the perspective of an individual farmer or farmer group (referred to as the actor) when defining objectives and outcomes and not, for example, that of an NGO, gove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The iterative development of the framework provided a boundary object that helped our NGO partners articulate their knowledge and practice and contribute to the team’s learning process. This validated our NGO partners’ practice and also helped them to better understand the behavioural change process, including why past interventions were not successful, and appreciate their role in the change process (see Merritt et al 2022 ). The framework represents a model of change from a research and practitioner perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The iterative development of the framework provided a boundary object that helped our NGO partners articulate their knowledge and practice and contribute to the team’s learning process. This validated our NGO partners’ practice and also helped them to better understand the behavioural change process, including why past interventions were not successful, and appreciate their role in the change process (see Merritt et al 2022 ). The framework represents a model of change from a research and practitioner perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In these projects, all aspects of the problem including crop production, agricultural economics and water management, are heavily shaped by socio-cultural factors including poverty, self-agency, gender norms and power imbalances (Hamilton et al 2022). While the focus of the research more broadly was on achieving more socially inclusive and equitable outcomes from investments and interventions in the communities, modelling, or more specifically, integrated assessment, was used as a tool for integrating and formalising the team's understanding of the system (Merritt et al 2022). With social inclusion the core principle of the projects, we considered our role as researchers in contributing to inclusion/exclusion; here we focus on inclusion in the modelling.One of the key challenges in our attempts to make modelling socially inclusive has been the need to reconcile the institutional expectations (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%