Reflections From a Point-of-Care Pilot Nurse Group Experience

Thoman, Joan; Struk, Cynthia; Spero, Marie O.; Stricklin, Mary Lou V.

doi:10.1097/00004045-200112000-00009

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Summary of reviewed articles is shown in Table 1. Al Farsi (2006), Connelly et al (1992), Crowe andSim (2004), D'Alessandro et al (2004), Eley et al (2005), Firby et al (1991), Galligioni et al (2009), Hier et al (2004), Hou et al (2006), Joos et al (2006), Jousimaa et al (1998), Kamadjeu et al (2005), Keshavje et al (2001), Kouri et al (2005), Larcher et al (2003), Marcy et al (2008), Magrabi et al (2007), Martinez et al (2007), O'Connell et al (2004, Ovretveit et al (2007), Pagliari et al (2003), Pare and Sicotte (2006), Popernack (2006), Pourasghar et al (2008), Soar et al (1993), Thoman et al (2001), Vanmeerbeek (2004), Whittaker et al(2009), Zheng et al(2005) Perceived ease of use 17 Connelly et al (1992), Di Pietro (2008), Eley et al (2005), Galligioni et al (2009), Haynes et al (1990), Kouri et al (2005), Likourezo et al 2004, Ovretveit et al (2007), Pagliari et al (2003), Pare and Sicotte (2006), Pourasghar et al (2008)…”

Section: Critical Success Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ranking Critical Success Factors of Healthcare Management Information Systems Using AHP

M¹,

Subramoniam²

2014

Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ranking of Critical Success Factors (CSF) of Healthcare Management Information System (HMIS) help practitioners to identify vital factors from the trivial many that are essential for its success. The objective of this study is to rank the CSF of HMIS using a suitable Multi-Criteria Decision Making technique (MCDM). Here, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is the MCDM used to determine the relative importance of the CSF in influencing the adoption and use of HMIS. In order to rank the factors, this study is planned and performed in two stages. At the first stage to identify the critical success factors of HMIS, a through literature review is made. At the second stage, a pair wise comparison is designed based on AHP method to collect the opinions of experts and distributed among 15 persons of the organizational experts/academicians. The pairwise comparisons got from this stage are analysed by AHP. The research findings indicate that the critical success factors in HIS have different priorities and weights.The weightage got from AHP can also be used for ranking of various HMIS installations in different hospitals.

show abstract

Section: Critical Success Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eley et al 2005, Firby et al (1991), Haynes et al (1990), Hier et al (2004), Larcher et al (2003), Lee et al (2009), O'Connell et al 2004, Thoman et al (2001), Crosson et al (2008) Self efficacy 7 Cheng (2003), Firby et al (1991), Yeh etal. (2009), Torkzadeh et al (2002), Barbeite et al (2004), Bedard et al (2003), Hasan (2003).…”

Section: Attitudementioning

confidence: 99%

Ranking Critical Success Factors of Healthcare Management Information Systems Using AHP

M¹,

Subramoniam²

2014

Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several articles concerning individual agency experiences were found (Crossen-Sills et al, 2009;Smith, 2004;Stazesky, 2003;Stricklin et al, 2001;Struk, 2001;Thoman, 2001). The software vendor currently used by the HHA has 65 customers.…”

Section: One Organization's Journey To a Poc Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of a Point of Care System in Home Health

Sánchez¹

2009

Home Healthcare Nurse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The pilot nurses' perceptions and responses to POC technology at four months of field use were obtained from a focus group substudy [42]. Clinical software presented difficulties from the point of access (passwords) through its navigability and clinical output (paper and printing).…”

Section: Nurse Acceptancementioning

confidence: 99%

Point of Care Technology: A Sociotechnical Approach to Home Health Implementation

Stricklin¹,

Struk²

2003

Methods Inf Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Objectives: This paper describes an ongoing evaluation study of the design and implementation of Point of Care (POC) technology in a home health agency. Methods: During the implementation of POC technology data about user acceptance were collected with the help of surveys and statistically analyzed. The survey also allowed for entering non-structured observations. A time series study was conducted to identify factors associated with technology change and its effect on professional competency. Results and Conclusions: Healthcare markets and consumers are demanding that providers use sophisticated information technology to document, transmit and access clinical and financial information across all delivery points. Newly adapted Patient Care Information Systems (PCIS) are available for clinical use in home care. The factors associated with home care nurses’ end user acceptance and use of the POC technology in clinical work are described. A sociotechnical approach with selected change management strategies appears to have positively influenced the nurse end users’ POC technology adoption and use in clinical work.

show abstract

Reflections From a Point-of-Care Pilot Nurse Group Experience

Cited by 5 publications

References 3 publications

Ranking Critical Success Factors of Healthcare Management Information Systems Using AHP

Ranking Critical Success Factors of Healthcare Management Information Systems Using AHP

Implementation of a Point of Care System in Home Health

Point of Care Technology: A Sociotechnical Approach to Home Health Implementation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About