2014
DOI: 10.1558/jmea.v27.i2.255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections on Pleistocene Island Occupation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unambiguous evidence for human presence on Mediterranean islands still dates to no more than c . 16,000 ya [ 47 ]. Thus, maritime contact between the two continents could have begun before 10,000 ya, the time depth for which the most frequent H Hgs can be used to detect migrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unambiguous evidence for human presence on Mediterranean islands still dates to no more than c . 16,000 ya [ 47 ]. Thus, maritime contact between the two continents could have begun before 10,000 ya, the time depth for which the most frequent H Hgs can be used to detect migrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have addressed the importance of small islands in human prehistory that were regularly and easily inhabited and/or accessible to terrestrial and marine resources [ 31 ], as well as the early evidence of maritime traffic and trade in this area of the Mediterranean Sea. Although many scientists believe that maritime travel probably developed after the LGM, lower sea levels would have connected many of the present-day islands and reduced the distance between other islands, making them accessible via short crossings [ 32 ]. The first (14-10 kyrs BP) reliable evidence of human settlement in Sicily derive from palaeoanthropological remains from the Grotta di San Teodoro, a site near Messina [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contrasts with Runnels (2014) and Bednarik (2003) who assert that many of these species were able to deliberately, and perhaps strategically, make water crossings. As Phoca-Cosmetatou and Rabett (2014) keenly point out, the major disjuncture in this debate relates to a priori expectations of hominin cognitive abilities. Instead of comparing hominin decision Journal of Archaeological Research (2021) 29:255-326 making against strict criteria of our own abilities for controlled and strategic action, we can use the global data to rethink each regional population and associated watercrossing behaviors in their own right.…”
Section: Water-crossing Behaviors Within the Genus Homomentioning
confidence: 99%