Reflections on Social Work Doctoral Pedagogy: A Reciprocal Approach to Enhancing Preparation for the Academy

Chen, Xin; Cheung, Monit; Zhou, Shu; Leung, Patrick; Glaude, Maurya

doi:10.1080/08841233.2020.1788197

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The collaborators’ effort includes not only the amount of time they dedicate but also their mentoring effort. Providing mentorship in teaching and research is considered a leadership responsibility of senior faculty members (Chen et al, 2020). Delavega et al (2017) referred to this mentoring process as an “engaged scholarship” and considered it to be a “signature research methodology in social work” (p. 568).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to Determine the Order of Authorship for Social Work Research

Cheung

Leung

et al. 2020

Research on Social Work Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Coauthorship is a means for assessing each contributor’s effort on a joint publication. This study aims to identify methods to determine publication coauthorship for crediting effort and order. Method: The research team searched for a framework to affirm the decision-making process when preparing for a coauthored publication by analyzing existing literature and published guidelines in authorship determination. Results: Four coauthorship principles—fairness, accountability, transparency, and effort (FATE)—were described with guidelines. The FATE framework helped the team develop a checklist for scholars to document their research productivity in collaborative projects. Examples of questions were derived from the framework to stimulate educational discussions and collaborative research ideas. Discussion: The coauthorship checklist could provide support for mentors to evaluate their protégés’ performance. Further research is needed to justify its application for initiating conversations about coauthorship. Operational guidelines should also be developed to prevent biases in reporting effort contributions.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to Determine the Order of Authorship for Social Work Research

Cheung

Leung

et al. 2020

Research on Social Work Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some practical implications that PETE doctoral programs may consider are providing doctoral students the space and time to form collaborations with colleagues across the department or actively seek mentorship from scholars outside of their institutions (Chen et al, 2020). This work could also be extended to designing professional development opportunities aiming to reduce workplace stress and improve job satisfaction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceived organizational support, marginalization, isolation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction of PETE faculty members

Kinder

Richards

Trad

et al. 2023

European Physical Education Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research has highlighted the role of workplace experiences in relation to outcomes, such as job satisfaction, among inservice physical education teachers. More recently, scholars have extended this line of scholarship to explore how higher education faculty members experience and navigate the sociopolitical context of higher education. Guided by occupational socialization theory, the purpose of this study was to understand the interactions among workplace experiences, which include perceived organizational support, marginalization, isolation, and emotional exhaustion, and their association with physical education teacher education faculty members’ perceived job satisfaction. Toward this end, a theoretically driven conceptual model was developed and evaluated using structural equation modeling. The sample comprised 283 United States (US)-based physical education teacher education (PETE) faculty members, and data were collected through an online survey that aimed to measure the identified study variables. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to verify the factor structure before advancing to structural equation modeling. The results of structural equation modeling supported the hypothesized relationships among variables, C3(141) = 294.56, p < .001; RMSEA = .075 (90% CI = [.066, 0.085], p < .001); SRMR = .057; NNFI = .962; CFI = .969. While some of the pathways were not significant, the associations of perceived organizational support on emotional exhaustion and job satisfaction were partially mediated by marginalization and isolation. Faculty members’ perceived organizational support and emotional exhaustion were important predictors of the perceptions of job satisfaction. Further research exploring the skills faculty utilize to increase and manage emotional exhaustion is warranted.

show abstract