2021
DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipab018
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections on the murky legal practices of political micro-targeting from a GDPR perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, it remains debatable whether the proposed regulation will be able to curtain micro-targeting because it still allows political profiling and targeting based on the consent of citizens. As has been frequently argued, people neither understand to what they are consenting to nor are sufficiently aware that they are being profiled after their consents have been given (Brkan, 2023;Casagran & Vermeulen, 2021;Ruohonen, 2023;Ruohonen & Mickelsson, 2023). It can be argued that it is specifically those people who do not understand the situation with their consents who are also the most prone to be influenced by micro-targeting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, it remains debatable whether the proposed regulation will be able to curtain micro-targeting because it still allows political profiling and targeting based on the consent of citizens. As has been frequently argued, people neither understand to what they are consenting to nor are sufficiently aware that they are being profiled after their consents have been given (Brkan, 2023;Casagran & Vermeulen, 2021;Ruohonen, 2023;Ruohonen & Mickelsson, 2023). It can be argued that it is specifically those people who do not understand the situation with their consents who are also the most prone to be influenced by micro-targeting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also Articles 24, 25, 28, 32, and 35 must be taken into account (EDPB, 2021, p. 31). Of these, Article 25 is typically violated by platforms engaging in micro-targeting; they do not obey the principle of data protection by design and by default (Casagran & Vermeulen, 2021). In any case, according to the proposed law, actual targeting of political advertisements based on sensitive personal data is still prohibited unless the two noted exemptions apply.…”
Section: Political Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to political microtargeting, two types of actors could be regarded as data controllers namely 'the online platforms and the political actors' (Casagran & Vermeulen, 2021). The Bavarian Administrative Court in 2018 held that Facebook and the user of the Audience should be considered joint data controllers (VG Bayreuth, Beschluss v. 08.05.2018 -B 1 S 18.105).…”
Section: Ii) the Data Protection Act 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2016, Collage admitted that more than 100 million Collage accounts had been stolen by hackers and traded on the black market [2]. In March 2018, the UK Guardian reported that the US social giant Facebook had compromised the information of 50 million users [3]. In 2020, Microsoft revealed the leak of 250 million customer service and support records during a 14-year span.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%