Reformist Multipolarity and Global Trade Governance in an Era of Systemic Power Redistribution

Abstract

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from SAGE Publications via http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0974910115613695This article assesses the role of emerging powers in the liberal order by examining the diplomacy of these states in the Doha Round of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The article discusses the changing shape of global trade governance through the insights provided by multipolarity, unipolarity as well as critical perspectives on emerging states. Based on the insights provided by these approaches, the article provides an analytical account of WTO negotiations to argue that the changing position of emerging powers in global trade governance is indicative of a system of reformist multipolarity. This system entails three major characteristics. First, it is based on a multipolar decision-making process where established and emerging powers hold veto power over the negotiating process, but commit to the stable management of the global economy. Second, it comprises a nascent great power concert where established and emerging powers share a common worldview on the centrality of the WTO to operate as the overarching authority for regulating and managing global trade. Third, emerging states maintain a reformist approach in this multipolar system seeking to renegotiate the rights and responsibilities to be undertaken by each major stakeholderpreprintPeer reviewe

On Evolutionary Geoeconomics and the RCEP Case: A Correlative SWOT Analysis

“…As a group, these countries have perhaps the most explicit ideological position compared to their counterpart institutions -new multipolarity ambitions that do not seem capable at present of leading to the construction of new global regulatory mechanisms despite the apparent desire of these member states. 68 The defense of democratic institutions is at the core of socioeconomic development in the future and any deviation leads to comparative disadvantages eventually.…”

Emerging Powers, Leadership, and South–South Solidarity: The Battle Over Special and Differential Treatment at the WTO

“…on their use of tariffs, subsidies and other protectionist trade measures. This clash over SDT was a central factor in the collapse of the Doha Round, and it has remained an acute and persistent source of conflict in subsequent negotiating efforts at the WTO since then (Efstathopoulos, 2016;Hopewell, 2016;Narlikar, 2020;Sinha, 2021;Weinhardt, 2020).…”

“…Instead, these states argue that the emerging powers must take on greater responsibility in the trading system commensurate with their growing economic might – meaning undertaking greater commitments to open their markets and accept disciplines on their use of tariffs, subsidies and other protectionist trade measures. This clash over SDT was a central factor in the collapse of the Doha Round, and it has remained an acute and persistent source of conflict in subsequent negotiating efforts at the WTO since then (Efstathopoulos, 2016; Hopewell, 2016; Narlikar, 2020; Sinha, 2021; Weinhardt, 2020).…”

Spatial Fragmentation of, and US Support for, the Main Multilateral Institutions of the Western Order

“…It remains to be seen whether the WTO has adapted better than the other organizations to changing conditions (Narlikar 2010) and now registers a form of reformist multipolarity that grants it great stability (Efstathopoulos 2016). In the meantime, the deadlock has caused the US to start negotiating the TPP and the TTIP, and to consider them strategic.…”