2017
DOI: 10.1108/s0363-326820170000033004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reforms and Supervisory Organizations: Lessons from the History of the Istanbul Bourse, 1873–1883

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foreign intervention in the Ottoman financial sector, by diminishing local economic sovereignty, reduced investors’ perceptions of risk and, accordingly, the volatility of the Ottoman bonds. Istanbul stock exchange data show that investors responded positively to foreign intervention (Autheman 2002: 22; Hanedar & Celikay 2017). The more the Empire adopted externally influenced and controlled financial institutions, the more the volatility of Ottoman bonds decreased.…”
Section: Evidence Of Exogenously Induced Ottoman Financial Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foreign intervention in the Ottoman financial sector, by diminishing local economic sovereignty, reduced investors’ perceptions of risk and, accordingly, the volatility of the Ottoman bonds. Istanbul stock exchange data show that investors responded positively to foreign intervention (Autheman 2002: 22; Hanedar & Celikay 2017). The more the Empire adopted externally influenced and controlled financial institutions, the more the volatility of Ottoman bonds decreased.…”
Section: Evidence Of Exogenously Induced Ottoman Financial Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%