1990
DOI: 10.1364/ao.29.004468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractive index profile measurement techniques by reflectivity profiling: vidicon imaging, beam scanning, and sample scanning

Abstract: The refractive index profiles of titanium-diffused LiNbO(3) planar and channel waveguides are determined directly by measuring the reflectivity of angular polished surfaces. Three measurement techniques are described and compared: (1) large area illumination of the angular polished waveguide and imaging of the reflected light to a vidicon, (2) scanning of a focused beam across the sample, and (3) scanning of the sample under a focused beam. Preference is given to the last method which provides an accuracy of D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include ellipsometry using multiple angle data [1], mode measurements mediated with a prism coupler (for both guided and leaky modes) [2][3][4], reflectance analysis [5,6] and numerous interferometric methods [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Each method has advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include ellipsometry using multiple angle data [1], mode measurements mediated with a prism coupler (for both guided and leaky modes) [2][3][4], reflectance analysis [5,6] and numerous interferometric methods [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Each method has advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the sample is known to support only guided modes, then a smooth monotonically decreasing index profile can be deduced without further assumptions [4]. Reflectance measurements are not limited to planar index profiles but require careful sample preparation and are sensitive only to large index differences [5,6]. Interferometric measurements on cross sections of samples require careful sample preparation and are limited to the analysis of index profiles that are deep due to the magnification of the optical system [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When reconstructing the profiles we reduced the number of profile parameters by fixing b = 0 in (2), assuming a Gaussian-like index distribution in depth which is known to be a good approximation in the case of diffused waveguides in LiNbO 3 [12]. Thereby, the computation time is considerably reduced.…”
Section: Profile Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In destructive approaches, samples must be processed before the measurement, such as reflectivity profiling [1], ellipsometry [2]. The non-destructive method takes advantage of intact waveguide sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techniques used to solve this problem are classified to destructive and non-destructive method. In destructive approaches, samples must be processed before the measurement, such as reflectivity profiling [1], ellipsometry [2]. The non-destructive method takes advantage of intact waveguide sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%