2006
DOI: 10.1080/10789669.2006.10391186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refrigerant Leakage Detection and Diagnosis for a Distributed Refrigeration System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AFDD methods for industrial systems typically function by monitoring specific performance indices or features that are sensitive to a particular fault. When a performance index significantly deviates from its expected value or exceeds a predetermined threshold, the AFDD method can detect the presence of a fault [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. In other cases, it is addressed as a classification problem [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFDD methods for industrial systems typically function by monitoring specific performance indices or features that are sensitive to a particular fault. When a performance index significantly deviates from its expected value or exceeds a predetermined threshold, the AFDD method can detect the presence of a fault [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. In other cases, it is addressed as a classification problem [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fault detection performance of the SVDD method was better than the PCA method. In [8], refrigerant leaks were detected and diagnosed using a probabilistic ANN algorithm; the ANN could detect refrigerant losses with 90% accuracy. In [9], the better performance of a Probabilistic Neural Network is demonstrated compared to Back Propagation (BP) method as BP has random initial wights leading to a less reliable system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable portion of the charge is released to the atmosphere, due to leakage in the refrigeration piping, valves, and joints (Francis et al 2017). The annual leakage rate has been estimated in the range of 15%-20% by Assawamartbunlue and Brandemuehl (2006) to 25% by ICF Consulting (2005). Because of this leakage, supermarkets have significant direct and indirect emission rates in addition to the energy-related impacts (James and James 2010;Beshr et al 2015;Islam et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%