2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refuge size, group living and symbiosis: testing the “resource economic monopolization” hypothesis with the shrimp Betaeus lilianae and description of its partnership with the crab Platyxanthus crenulatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such interaction, however, do not lead to discernible differences in body size among adult P. minutus with respect to RSA. Collectively, these results support the prediction that group size and composition of refuge-dwelling animals are modulated by refuge size and the per-individual value and feasibility of refuge monopolization [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such interaction, however, do not lead to discernible differences in body size among adult P. minutus with respect to RSA. Collectively, these results support the prediction that group size and composition of refuge-dwelling animals are modulated by refuge size and the per-individual value and feasibility of refuge monopolization [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…greatly in size, offer us an opportunity to test whether variation in refuge size consistently influences group size and composition within a species. Because refuge size dictates the per-individual value and feasibility of refuge monopolization [3,5], we predict that, regardless of substratum type, groups should be larger and less exclusive when refuges are relatively large and smaller and more exclusive when refuges are relatively small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fish, mantis shrimp, amongst others). The large claws of snapping shrimps (notice claw size in Figure 1C) likely decrease the chances of Salmoneus carvachoi being attacked, for example by fish predators (see Baeza et al, 2010). Benefits or costs for snapping and mud shrimps resulting from the association with Salmoneus carvachoi are more difficult to foresee.…”
Section: Symbiosis Between Salmoneus Carvachoi and Burrowing Crustaceansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gobius paganellus generally remained in the same rockpool, suggesting a site fidelity behaviour and avoidance to cross into nearby pools. This fidelity behaviour is potentially associated with: (i) increased predator refuge conditions, such as comparatively higher algae canopy cover or increased crevice availability (Baeza & Thiel, 2007;Baeza, Farías, Luppi, & Spivak, 2010); (ii) territorial and food defence behaviours (Baeza & Thiel, 2003Emlen & Oring, 1977) and; (iii) preference F I G U R E 2 Overview of Gobius paganellus recaptured tagged individuals, represented as the average percentage of recaptured individuals in all recapture occasions, per sampled rockpool (P1 through P12).…”
Section: Gobius Paganellusmentioning
confidence: 99%