Background
The combination of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) is gaining increasing acceptance, but a standardized approach to be implemented in the clinical setting is necessary.
Objectives
To investigate the accuracy of a combined coronary CTA and myocardial CTP comprehensive protocol compared to coronary CTA alone, using a combination of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) as reference.
Methods
Three-hundred eighty-one patients included in CORE320 trial were analyzed in this study. Flow-limiting stenosis was defined as the presence of ≥50% stenosis by ICA with a related perfusion deficit by SPECT. The combined CTA+CTP definition of disease was the presence of a ≥50% stenosis with a related perfusion deficit. All data sets were analyzed by two experienced readers, aligning anatomical findings by CTA with perfusion deficits by CTP.
Results
Mean patient age was 62±6 years (66% male), 27% with prior history of myocardial infarction. In a per-patient analysis, sensitivity for CTA alone was 93% specificity was 54%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 55%; negative predictive value (NPV) 93% and overall accuracy was 69%. After combining CTA and CTP, sensitivity was 78%, specificity 73%, NPV 64%; PPV 0.85% and overall accuracy was 75%. In a per-vessel analysis, overall accuracy of CTA alone was 73%as compared to 79% for the combination of CTA and CTP (p<0.0001 for difference).
Conclusions
Combining coronary CTA and myocardial CTP findings through a comprehensive protocol is feasible. While sensitivity is lower, specificity and overall accuracy are higher than assessment by coronary CTA when compared against a reference standard of stenosis with an associated perfusion deficit.