2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.09.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regarding “Giant splenic artery aneurysms: Case report and review of the literature”

Abstract: We have read with interest the article by Radu Pescarus et al. 1 The authors report an unusual case of a giant splenic artery aneurysm (SAA) treated by open surgical repair with good results and provide a review of the 12 giant SAAs published to date.They find a different pattern with respect to the small SAAs: male predominance, absence of a clear etiologic factor, situation in the middle third of the artery, and a higher presentation with rupture (25%). At the same time, the surgery in their case needed a me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main caveat with these endovascular techniques is that they may be impractical for long and extremely tortuous lesions, so a stent graft well not be considered as a feasible solution mostly due to hilar presence of splenic fistula and tortuousity of splenic artery. A thirty six percutaneous catheter embolization of giant aneurysms and even ruptured giant aneurysms with metal coils, balloons, and sponges has been reported with favorable results, 17) with potential complications include pain fever, embolism to other visceral arteries, abscess formation, arterial disruption, contrast nephrotoxicity, incomplete occlusion and re-canalization, despite these drawbacks, transcatheter embolization appears to have a lower incidence of serious complications compared with surgery, has a success rate of approximately 85%, and may even be considered as a first-line treatment in appropriate patients. 18) On the other hand it is less invasive, relatively low-risk, rapid procedure can be easily applied regardless location of vascular malformation and it does not necessitate splenectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main caveat with these endovascular techniques is that they may be impractical for long and extremely tortuous lesions, so a stent graft well not be considered as a feasible solution mostly due to hilar presence of splenic fistula and tortuousity of splenic artery. A thirty six percutaneous catheter embolization of giant aneurysms and even ruptured giant aneurysms with metal coils, balloons, and sponges has been reported with favorable results, 17) with potential complications include pain fever, embolism to other visceral arteries, abscess formation, arterial disruption, contrast nephrotoxicity, incomplete occlusion and re-canalization, despite these drawbacks, transcatheter embolization appears to have a lower incidence of serious complications compared with surgery, has a success rate of approximately 85%, and may even be considered as a first-line treatment in appropriate patients. 18) On the other hand it is less invasive, relatively low-risk, rapid procedure can be easily applied regardless location of vascular malformation and it does not necessitate splenectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Percutaneous catheter embolization of giant aneurysms, and even ruptured giant aneurysms, with metal coils, balloons, and sponges has been reported with favorable results. 37,38 Recent advances in interventional radiology have led to the use of stent grafts for exclusion of visceral artery aneurysms. This technique allows preservation of a continuous arterial access to the spleen, which may be used for subsequent sequential embolization of the organ if necessary (to treat hypersplenism for example).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be located at any portion of the artery, but are commonly at the distal zones close to the splenic paranchyme. The main complication of these aneurysms is rupture, with a 2% to 10% risk that has a 20% to 30% mortality rate [Pescarus 2005;Hernandez-Lahoz 2006]. Even though treatment indications are unclear, surgery is indicated for symptomatic patients, patients with enlarging aneurysms, pregnant patients, patients anticipating pregnancy, patients with portal hypertension presenting for liver transplantation, and patients with aneurysms larger than 2 cm in diameter [Pescarus 2005].…”
Section: E27mentioning
confidence: 99%