“…There are numerous methodologies reported for the deprotection of oximes and related compounds. 1,8 The classical method for the cleavage of oximes to carbonyls is acid hydrolysis, 9 although many other reagents, such as pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC) and related Cr(VI) compounds, 10 KMnO 4 / alumina, 11 trimethylphosphine and 2,2 0 -dipyridyl diselenide, 12 vanadomolybdophosphate (H 6 PMo 9 V 3 O 40 ), 13 mixed metal oxide CeO 2 -ZrO 2 , 14 FeCl 3 /TEMPO, 15 iron(III) porphyrin complex, 16 gaseous NO 2 , 17 Cu(I) chloride/kieselghur, 18 CuCl 2 , 2H 2 O, 19 mixed (Fe 2+ and Cu 2+ ) double metal hexacyanocobaltates, 20 platinum(II) terpyridyl acetylide complex/O 2 /hn, 21 TiO 2 /mesoporous silica, 22 cobalt(II) phthalocyanine/ionic liquid, 23 Au/CeO 2 , 24 I 2 /water, 25 2-nitro-4,5-dichloropyridazin-3(2H)-one, 26 and NaNO 2 , 27 have been also reported. Most of these methods are considerably efficient and produce good yields; however, they suffer from one or more serious drawbacks (Table 1), such as requiring the use of strong Lewis and Bronsted acids, 9 use of costly and hazardous metal/ligands (i.e., Mn, Cr, Ti, Au, and Pt), 10-16,20-24 use of toxic solvents, difficulty in catalyst/ product separation, problems associated with waste disposal, necessity of robust reaction conditions, generation of over-oxidized products, and long reaction time.…”