1990
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(90)90112-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regeneration of retinal axons in grafts of peripheral and central nervous tissue in the adult rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, in both neonate and adult hosts, spontaneously regenerating host retinal axons exhibit a specific affinity for the localized AChE-dense areas in tectal grafts, and it has been argued that these areas are in fact homologous to the retinorecipient SGS of the SC in situ Harvey and Lund, 1984a,b;Harvey et al, 1987;Harvey and Tan, 1992). However, when PN segments implanted into the retina were used as a bridge between lesioned RGCs and embryonic tectal tissue that had been injected into cortical lesion cavities, regenerating retinal axons exhibited limited penetration into the fetal neuropil, and we found no evidence for selective innervation of the presumptive retinorecipient target regions in tectal grafts (Tan et al, 1990). Others have reported retinal axon ingrowth into fetal tectal tissue via PN grafts (Thanos and Vanselow, 1990); however, these authors did not distinguish between presumptive target versus nontarget areas in tectal grafts, a critical issue since nontarget regions (the intermediate and deep layers) comprise 85-90% of the neuropil in such transplants (Harvey and MacDonald, 1985;Bairstow and Harvey, 1992).…”
contrasting
confidence: 44%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Importantly, in both neonate and adult hosts, spontaneously regenerating host retinal axons exhibit a specific affinity for the localized AChE-dense areas in tectal grafts, and it has been argued that these areas are in fact homologous to the retinorecipient SGS of the SC in situ Harvey and Lund, 1984a,b;Harvey et al, 1987;Harvey and Tan, 1992). However, when PN segments implanted into the retina were used as a bridge between lesioned RGCs and embryonic tectal tissue that had been injected into cortical lesion cavities, regenerating retinal axons exhibited limited penetration into the fetal neuropil, and we found no evidence for selective innervation of the presumptive retinorecipient target regions in tectal grafts (Tan et al, 1990). Others have reported retinal axon ingrowth into fetal tectal tissue via PN grafts (Thanos and Vanselow, 1990); however, these authors did not distinguish between presumptive target versus nontarget areas in tectal grafts, a critical issue since nontarget regions (the intermediate and deep layers) comprise 85-90% of the neuropil in such transplants (Harvey and MacDonald, 1985;Bairstow and Harvey, 1992).…”
contrasting
confidence: 44%
“…The aim of this study was to determine whether prior exposure to a PN graft influenced the way in which regenerating adult RGC axons interacted with developing target neurons in fetal tectal grafts. The experimental protocol differed in a number of important ways from an earlier study (Tan et al, 1990), the goal being to increase the amount of retinal axon growth through PN bridges and to provide regrown axons with a greater opportunity to grow into tectal neuropil. Changes included (1) PN transplantation onto the optic nerve rather than into the lesioned retina, (2) transplantation of fetal tectal tissue into cortical lesion cavities as flat sheets rather than by injection through a glass micropipette, and (3) increasing the time delay between transplantation of the PN and fetal tectal tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations