2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/267691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Region Duplication Forgery Detection Technique Based on SURF and HAC

Abstract: Region duplication forgery detection is a special type of forgery detection approach and widely used research topic under digital image forensics. In copy move forgery, a specific area is copied and then pasted into any other region of the image. Due to the availability of sophisticated image processing tools, it becomes very hard to detect forgery with naked eyes. From the forged region of an image no visual clues are often detected. For making the tampering more robust, various transformations like scaling, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method reduces the false positive rate while still maintaining a high true positive rate. As seen from Table 4, the execution time for block based methods: Fridirch et al [14] and Popescu and Farid [39] are high compared with keypoint based methods: [18,37,38] and our method. The time required to detect forgery in our method is faster than Pan and Lyu's method [38] and Amerini et al [18].…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our method reduces the false positive rate while still maintaining a high true positive rate. As seen from Table 4, the execution time for block based methods: Fridirch et al [14] and Popescu and Farid [39] are high compared with keypoint based methods: [18,37,38] and our method. The time required to detect forgery in our method is faster than Pan and Lyu's method [38] and Amerini et al [18].…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Key-points-based techniques [18,22,37,38] and image regions based methods [14,39]. The true positive rates, false positive rates, Precision and Recall are evaluated on the tampered and authentic images from the …”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIFT) have recently been proposed for locating copy-pasted areas [12,16]. Unlike block generation-based methods, keypoint-based methods consider features extracted from the entire image (i.e., without subdivision), and the extracted features are compared with one and another to locate similar keypoints [26].…”
Section: Keypoint-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the method based on SIFT keypoints [15] and another based on SURF with hierarchical agglomerative clustering [12] are considered as the representative conventional methods. The results in terms of TPR and FPR are recorded in Table 4.…”
Section: Comparison With Conventional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation