2008 IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icde.2008.4497488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Region Sampling: Continuous Adaptive Sampling on Sensor Networks

Abstract: Abstract-Satisfying energy constraints while meeting performance requirements is a primary concern when a sensor network is being deployed. Many recent proposed techniques offer error bounding solutions for aggregate approximation but cannot guarantee energy spending. Inversely, our goal is to bound the energy consumption while minimizing the approximation error. In this paper, we propose an online algorithm, Region Sampling, for computing approximate aggregates while satisfying a pre-defined energy budget. Ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An optimal sensor placement should be able to maximize the sensor coverage and in the meanwhile to minimize the number of sensors required. For placing K sensors optimally in an arbitrary sensor field, this work is known to be NP hard; thus a couple of efficient nearoptimal algorithms are provided [17][20] [7] [21]. In Andreas' works like [17], a greedy solution is designed by using mutual information when selecting next sensor point; this has better performance than traditional random solution or other basic entropy-based sensor selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An optimal sensor placement should be able to maximize the sensor coverage and in the meanwhile to minimize the number of sensors required. For placing K sensors optimally in an arbitrary sensor field, this work is known to be NP hard; thus a couple of efficient nearoptimal algorithms are provided [17][20] [7] [21]. In Andreas' works like [17], a greedy solution is designed by using mutual information when selecting next sensor point; this has better performance than traditional random solution or other basic entropy-based sensor selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], the method supports imprecise sensor detection like terrain properties, which can support sensor placement with probabilistic guarantee in a polynomial time. The work of regions sampling in [21] studies local aggregation on sensor network and builds adaptive sampling for each partial region. All of these works are not designed for mobile sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial data, such as sensor network data and object movement logs, have recently become more widely available [4,10,14,15,17,19,21,26,28]. Spatial data usually have two kinds of attributes: optimization attributes and geographic attributes [16,18,23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…q sets of wavelet coefficients, could be greater than that for obtaining any of the q versions alone. Sampling methods can be used to incrementally obtain data from sensor networks [24], as the proposed EAQ scheme does. However, the full set of data usually cannot be recovered from samples with bounded L ∞ -norm error.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%