2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional analysis of storm hydrographs in the Rescaled Width Function framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this paper, we introduce a slight change to improve the procedure, referring to the lag time (T L ) instead of T c , where T L can be defined as the centre of mass of the IUH and is linked to T c through the relationship 0.6T c (Chow et al 1988, Di Lazzaro 2009). The concept is to assign a v c value so that the IUH centroid is equal to T L = 0.6T c .…”
Section: Rainfall-runoff Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this paper, we introduce a slight change to improve the procedure, referring to the lag time (T L ) instead of T c , where T L can be defined as the centre of mass of the IUH and is linked to T c through the relationship 0.6T c (Chow et al 1988, Di Lazzaro 2009). The concept is to assign a v c value so that the IUH centroid is equal to T L = 0.6T c .…”
Section: Rainfall-runoff Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Botter and Rinaldo, 2003); on the contrary, for large catchments the sloping planes effectively account for both the responses of hillslopes and tributaries and we can assume V h /V c = 1 as an upper bound (e.g. Di Lazzaro, 2008;Di Lazzaro, 2009). With regards to the rainstorm characteristics, we set the distance of the starting point (x 0 , y 0 ) from the outlet equal to R/ L = 3, i.e.…”
Section: Setup Of the Illustration Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative contribution of hillslope processes and network geomorphology to the catchment's hydrologic response has been investigated by several researchers (Saco and Kumar, 2004;Viglione et al, 2010). A general result is that the relative role and mutual interactions of hillslope and channel network transport change substantially with catchment size (Beven and Wood, 1993;Di Lazzaro, 2009;Kirkby, 1976;Robinson et al, 1995;Saco and Kumar, 2002). In small catchments, the time delay to rainfall forcing tends to be dominated by the routing of surface and subsurface flow on the hillslopes, whereas in large catchments the flow routing through the river network controls the hydrograph shape (Beven and Wood, 1993;Botter and Rinaldo, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%